San Lo Bi Vb Pc 21Eating at a Public Guest-house
Pāli / Sanskrit:Āvasathapiṇḍa
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Explanation of the Āvasathapiṇḍa Rule
On Eating at a Public Guest House
Background
This rule is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pācittiya section, the relatively lighter training rules in the Pātimokkha, the code of discipline for bhikkhus. The Āvasathapiṇḍa rule reflects a specific case that occurred in the time of the Buddha Gotama, when bhikkhus inadvertently or deliberately ate food at public places such as guest houses (āvasatha).
In the context of early Buddhism, public guest houses were places used to receive travelers, merchants, or those who had lost their way. They were not the homes of individual householders, but common spaces. This distinction is very important because it affects how bhikkhus practice discipline in receiving food and eating.
Main Content
According to the Theravāda Vinaya tradition, this rule concerns a situation in which bhikkhus ate food provided at a public guest house without following the proper regulations. This violation is classified as Pācittiya, a rule requiring a bhikkhu to confess the fault and make amends.
The central issue is not that eating at a guest house is inherently wrong, but the manner and intention behind the act. The Vinaya always emphasizes the principle that bhikkhus should eat from trustworthy sources, from people who provide food with good intention clearly and directly. Eating at a public guest house may create uncertainty about the origin of the food, the intention of the provider, or the possibility that bhikkhus are understood as “begging” in a way unsuitable to the standards of the Sangha community.
Such Pācittiya rules were established to protect something important: the respect and confidence of society toward the Sangha. Bhikkhus practice not to seek personal benefit but for the welfare of beings.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.