San Lo Bi Vb Pc 20Intentionally Killing Living Creatures
Pāli / Sanskrit:Sañcicca
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Sañcicca Text: Intentionally Killing Living Beings
Background
Sañcicca (sañ-cic-ca), from the Vinaya Piṭaka, is a training rule of the Pācittiya class, offenses requiring confession and correction. This text is recorded in the Bhikkhunī Vibhaṅga, the analysis of the discipline for women bhikkhus, the section teaching violations concerning women monastics in the Theravāda tradition.
The background arose from concrete situations in the early monastic community. The Buddha established these Dharma rules not to restrict freedom, but to protect the integrity of action and develop ethical conduct. The rule concerning the intentional killing of living beings (sañcicca paṇati) reflects the first principle of the Five Precepts, abstaining from killing, applied in a monastic context.
The term "sañcicca" means "intentional" or "deliberate," emphasizing that the action must involve a clear mental intention. This is different from accidental actions, which are not considered complete violations in the Theravāda Vinaya system.
Main Content
The Sañcicca rule prescribes that a bhikkhu or bhikkhunī must not intentionally and deliberately kill any living being, from the smallest creatures such as insects to large animals. This action not only violates the principle of abstaining from killing, but also reflects a lack of loving-kindness (mettā) and a lack of right intention (sammā-saṅkappa) in the process of practice.
The Vinaya distinguishes the actual nature of a violation based on three factors: intention (cetanā), action (kamma), and result (phala). If a monastic intentionally deprives an animal of life, by whatever means, that is considered a Pācittiya offense. The degree of seriousness depends on the intention: killing a living being for amusement is regarded as heavier than killing in self-defense or for another reason.
The difference between violation and non-violation also lies in whether the offender is fully aware of the action. If a bhikkhu accidentally steps on an ant or insect without knowing it, that is not a complete violation.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.