Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Upp Pc 44Intruding on a Couple Enjoying Themselves

Pāli / Sanskrit:Sabhojana

📖326 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Explanation of the Sabhojana Sutta (Upp Pc 44)

Background

The Sabhojana Sutta (Pāli: सभोजन) is a regulation in the Pātimokkha, the basic code for bhikkhus, within the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda Pāli Canon. This text appears in the Pācittiya section, rules requiring confession when violated.

The background of this regulation records an incident at the Buddha’s vihāra. There was a bhikkhu who, while a husband and wife were enjoying one another’s company, improperly inserted himself between them. This action was discourteous and disrupted the privacy and discretion that householders deserve to have respected. Seeing this occur, the Buddha established a regulation to protect both the honor of lay communities and the diligent training of those gone forth.

This regulation reflects a core principle of the Buddha-Dharma: respect for privacy and non-interference in the personal relationships of others. This is an aspect often overlooked, but extremely important in the social ethics of the Buddhist community.

Main Content

The regulation concerning “intruding upon a husband and wife enjoying one another’s company” (Sabhojana) states that if a bhikkhu deliberately intrudes upon or interrupts a husband and wife who are together privately, with the intention of displeasing them or disturbing their enjoyment, he commits a Pācittiya offense.

A Pācittiya offense is not the gravest violation in the Pātimokkha, but it requires the bhikkhu to confess before another bhikkhu or before the Sangha. This shows that the regulation has the character of warning and training conduct, rather than imposing an overly harsh punishment.

The factors needed to constitute the offense include: the deliberate act of intruding, the privacy of the husband and wife, and the intention to interrupt. If a bhikkhu happens to pass by, or does not know that a husband and wife are there, or if the act is not meant to disturb them, then it may not constitute this offense. This shows that Buddhist law pays close attention to intention (cetanā) in each action.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.