Lzh Sarv Bu Vb Pc 12Complaining
Pāli / Sanskrit:Ujjhāpanaka
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Sutta on Complaining (Ujjhāpanaka)
Background
The Sutta on Complaining belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically the Pācittiya section, a collection of disciplinary rules that are easily violated. Although this rule is recorded in the law collections of Buddhist traditions, the Pāli Canon of the Theravāda tradition preserves the essence of this teaching clearly.
The historical picture shows that monks in the Buddha’s time often faced the following situation: when a brother in the Sangha acted improperly, other monks would complain or grumble publicly or privately. This not only failed to solve the problem, but also harmed the unity of the Sangha, creating division and loss of trust. Seeing this harm, the Buddha established a rule to protect internal harmony in the Sangha and to teach proper conduct.
Main Content
Ujjhāpanaka (complaining, grumbling) prescribes that if a monk or bhikkhunī complains about the conduct of another monastic before those who are not members of the Sangha, such as laypeople or outsiders, without a valid reason for doing so, that monastic commits a Pācittiya offense, a fault requiring confession or acknowledgment.
This rule does not forbid practical exchange or discussion within the Sangha. On the contrary, it reminds practitioners that internal matters should be resolved within the framework of the Sangha, according to the proper rules and in a spirit of harmony. Bringing such matters outside to complain, publicly criticize, or create a bad impression of the Sangha before those who do not yet have faith in the Buddha is mistaken.
There are exceptions: if the action of that monastic violates a Pārājika or is extremely serious, informing appropriate persons in order to protect the Dharma is necessary. However, complaints without a firm basis or made from impure motives are violations.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.