Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Sarv Bu Pm Np 21An Extra Almsbowl

Pāli / Sanskrit:Patta

📖295 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

THE DISCOURSE ON THE EXTRA BOWL (Patta)

Background

In the Vinaya Piṭaka of Theravada Buddhism, regulations concerning the requisites of the Sangha are not meaningless details. They reflect the spirit of financial independence and simplicity in the religious life. The text "Patta" (almsbowl) records an event concerning bhikkhus possessing more than one bowl, which is the most basic implement in the almsgoing life of a practitioner.

The Sangha in the Buddha’s time was formed on the principle of austerity and emptiness of material desires. The bowl (patta) is a symbol of the minimum that is needed, not abundance, but self-sufficiency. The issue of possessing many bowls is not merely a physical matter, but also reflects psychological motives: greed, fear, or the assumption that one must have a "reserve" for the future.

Main Content

The text records that the Buddha established specific regulations concerning the number of bowls a bhikkhu is permitted to possess. This regulation was not an arbitrary prohibition, but the result of offenses committed by bhikkhus. When some bhikkhus began to store up many bowls, disadvantages appeared: difficulty in keeping them, the arising of possessive ambition, and even conflict over property.

According to the principles of the Vinaya, a bhikkhu should possess only one bowl. If his old bowl is damaged, he is permitted to have an additional bowl for use while awaiting repair. However, if that bhikkhu has more bowls than are legitimately needed, that is an act violating the rule. The issue does not lie in having an additional bowl in a necessary case, but in the intention and motive behind the act.

This shows the difference between the Vinaya and secular legal systems: it regulates not only external action, but also considers intention and motivating reason (cetanā).

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.