Lzh Sarv Bu Pm 2 Pc 9Criticizing Robe Distribution
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dubbala
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
The Discourse on Criticizing the Distribution of Robes (Dubbala)
Background
This discourse is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda tradition, in the Pātimokkha section, the basic precepts. During the Buddha's time, the monastic community lived primarily by the offerings of lay devotees, including essential requisites such as robes. The distribution of robes was an important matter in the management of the common property of the Sangha, carried out according to principles of fairness and transparency.
However, distribution did not always proceed smoothly. There were events in which monastics criticized, commented on, or interfered with the decisions of those entrusted with distribution. Such criticism could arise from greed, jealousy, or personal dissatisfaction, thereby harming harmony in the Sangha and distorting the original purpose of the offering.
Main Content
The Dubbala Sutta identifies the act of criticizing the distribution of robes as a violation of the Vinaya, a Pācittiya offense requiring confession. Specifically, when appointed persons or senior monastics distribute robes according to fair principles recognized by the Sangha, other monastics should not criticize or interfere with that decision.
The prohibited conduct includes: public or private criticism, negative speech about the distribution, creating doubt about its fairness, or encouraging other monastics to oppose decisions that have been made. The discourse emphasizes that even if a monastic thinks the distribution is unfair, he must follow the proper procedure for raising an objection, rather than criticizing arbitrarily.
The reason for establishing this precept is clear: to protect unity in the Sangha, maintain order and discipline, and respect the work of those who have been trusted. Allowing arbitrary criticism would open the way to endless disputes, factional division, and finally the weakening of the integrity of the monastic community.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.