Lzh Sarv Bi Vb Pc 8Criticizing Robe Distribution
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dubbala
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
DISCOURSE ON CRITICIZING THE DISTRIBUTION OF ROBES
Dubbala - A Rule in the Vinaya Piṭaka
Background
The Dubbala discourse (criticizing the distribution of robes) is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pātimokkha, the code of virtuous conduct for bhikkhus. The regulations in the Vinaya Piṭaka arose from specific situations that appeared in the early monastic community under the Buddha Śākyamuni.
In the historical context, the Sangha community grew strongly and faced problems concerning the management of property, especially necessary requisites for monastics such as robes. When issues related to the distribution and management of these items caused controversy and disharmony in the Sangha, the Buddha issued regulations to maintain discipline and the communal spirit. The Dubbala discourse is one such regulation, intended to address the phenomenon of Sangha members improperly criticizing the way robes were distributed.
Main Content
This discourse states that a bhikkhu should not publicly criticize or condemn decisions related to the distribution of robes in the Sangha. Such criticism, especially when made publicly or in a divisive manner, is considered a violation of the Pātimokkha, one of the basic rules of discipline.
The prohibited action is “dubbala,” that is, weakening or dividing the unity of the Sangha through unconstructive words of criticism. This does not forbid monastics from having their own opinions, but forbids public actions that create suspicion or disturbance in the community. If a bhikkhu has a problem with the manner of distribution, the proper solution is to discuss it directly with those presiding over the distribution or with the elders in the Sangha, not to criticize publicly.
This rule reflects a basic principle of the Vinaya Piṭaka: protecting concord and harmony (Saṁgha sāmaggi) is essential for the long-term flourishing of the community of practice. When internal disputes are voiced publicly, they damage the trust of laypeople and weaken the authority of the Sangha.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.