Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Sarv Bi Pm Ss 2Making a Groundless Accusation Out of Anger

Pāli / Sanskrit:Duṭṭhadosa

📖317 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Discourse on Groundless Accusation Because of Anger

(Duṭṭhadosa)

Background

The Duṭṭhadosa Sutta belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Pāli Canon, recording an event in the community of bhikkhus during the time of Buddha Śākyamuni. This discourse appears in the context of Buddhism building rules for collective practice, in order to protect harmony in the Sangha and prevent conduct harmful to the community of practice.

Anger (duṭṭhadosa) is one of the roots of offenses in Buddhism. When the mind is occupied by anger, a person not only harms himself or herself but also easily commits unethical acts, especially making groundless accusations against others. This discourse was taught by the Buddha to show the danger and consequences of allowing anger to take command, from which one acts to harm others through false speech.

Main Content

According to the Pāli Canon tradition, the Duṭṭhadosa Sutta records a case in which a bhikkhu, obsessed by anger, spoke out and accused another bhikkhu in a completely groundless way. This action violates one of the basic prohibitions in the Vinaya Piṭaka: not lying, not making accusations contrary to the truth, especially against those who practice.

The Buddha clearly shows that a lie born of anger not only violates moral conduct but also deeply violates basic ethical principles. When a monastic allows anger to control them, they lose clarity and objectivity, seeing others only through the eyes of judgment and hostility. At that point, lying becomes a tool for retaliation, for harming the other, and for releasing the anger inside.

The teaching states clearly that this act violates three domains: (1) violation of the precept through lying, (2) violation of the precept through accusation, and (3) violation of the spirit of practice because the mind is not pure. The Buddha emphasizes that this bhikkhu’s action not only creates bad karma for himself, but also destroys trust within the Sangha.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.