Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mu Bi Vb Pd 11Receiving Food From Designated Families

Pāli / Sanskrit:Tatiyapāṭidesanīya

📖274 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Tatiyapāṭidesanīya Sutta: Receiving Rice from Designated Families

Background

Tatiyapāṭidesanīya is found in the Pāṭidesanīya section, the rules requiring acknowledgment, of the Vinaya Piṭaka, within the disciplinary training program for bhikkhus in the Theravāda Buddhist tradition. These regulations were laid down by the Buddha to maintain the purity and discipline of the Saṅgha, while also protecting the reputation of the community before the people.

The background from which this rule arose was that some bhikkhus engaged in inappropriate conduct related to receiving food from particular families. The Buddha, seeing that such conduct could cause misunderstanding or diminish the faith of the lay community, established clear guidelines. The Tatiyapāṭidesanīya rule is the third in a series of rules requiring public acknowledgment when violated.

Main Content

The Tatiyapāṭidesanīya rule concerns a bhikkhu receiving food, especially rice or main meal portions, from designated families (paṭidesita). When a family invites a bhikkhu to come regularly for alms or promises to provide food periodically, this creates a special relationship that may lead to misunderstandings.

The Buddha pointed out that a bhikkhu’s excessive dependence on a particular family not only violates the principle of "non-attachment" (anurodha), but also adversely affects the reputation of the Saṅgha. From the perspective of the lay community, people may suspect that the bhikkhu has hidden aims or receives special favor for private reasons.

When this rule is violated, the bhikkhu must publicly acknowledge (paṭidesanīya) before the Saṅgha assembly or before fellow monastics that he has violated it. This is not a heavy penalty such as "nissaggiya pācittiya" (forfeiture offense), but it is a serious and public acknowledgment of fault intended to restore trust.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản tóm lược AI · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.