Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mi Bu Pm Pd 3Receiving Food From Designated Families

Pāli / Sanskrit:Tatiyapāṭidesanīya

📖271 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Explanation of the Tatiyapāṭidesanīya Sutta

The Third Declaration Concerning Food from Designated Families

Background

Tatiyapāṭidesanīya is one of the provisions of the Vinaya Piṭaka in the Theravāda Buddhist tradition. This sutta is directly related to the monastic rule, the Pātimokkha, and sets forth special restrictions on how bhikkhus receive food from families designated in advance.

The background for the arising of this rule comes from specific situations in the Sangha during the Buddha’s lifetime. Bhikkhus were sometimes chosen by particularly faithful families to be provided with daily food (piṇḍapāta). However, such situations could lead to favoritism, cause conflict in the Sangha, and weaken the faith of other families.

To maintain equality, purity, and freedom from disputes, the Blessed Buddha set forth Tatiyapāṭidesanīya, a public declaration of the conditions to be observed.

Main Content

The Tatiyapāṭidesanīya rule states that a bhikkhu should not regularly receive food from specific families or individuals “designated” (pāṭidesanā) to serve that monk. If a family wishes to provide food for a certain bhikkhu, this must be done openly and for a limited period, not as a permanent or secret arrangement.

The key point is to prevent the development of “preferential relationships” between bhikkhus and specific families. This protects the Sangha from suspicions of favoritism, especially criticisms that monks are “selling” the Dharma or nurturing relationships with wealthier families.

When a long-standing family wishes to provide food, they must publicly inform the Sangha or the abbot (ajahn/upajjhāya), and the period must be clearly determined. After this term ends, the relationship will either be formally renewed or brought to an end in a dignified manner.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.