Lzh Mu Bi Pm Pc 48Tickling
Pāli / Sanskrit:Aṅgulipatodaka
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Aṅgulipatodaka Discourse (Discourse on Poking)
Background
The Aṅgulipatodaka discourse appears in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pāṭimokkha of the Theravāda tradition. It is not an instructional sūtra but a monastic rule to be observed. This discourse belongs to the Pācittiya class, offenses requiring confession, and reflects the Buddha’s mindfulness toward actions that may appear harmless but conceal unwholesome states in the mind.
The background for the formation of this rule concerns bhikkhus who violated the principle of self-restraint. These bhikkhus engaged in frivolous activities, such as poking one another to provoke laughter and create distraction in practice. The Buddha, clearly recognizing that a wandering and frivolous mind is not suitable for the path, established this rule to protect mindfulness (sati) and concentration (samādhi) among the Sangha.
Main Content
The Aṅgulipatodaka rule forbids a bhikkhu from poking, prodding, or touching another person with a finger or the end of a stick carelessly, especially with the intention of causing laughter or agitation. This act is considered a Pācittiya offense, a fault lighter than Saṅghādisesa (an offense requiring formal proceedings of the Sangha), but still requiring confession before the Sangha.
More precisely, this rule aims to prevent actions that seem innocent but are in fact lacking in respect and self-control. Such actions lead to playfulness and laughter unbecoming of monastic status. This rule emphasizes that renunciation is not for entertainment but for liberation.
In the context of the ancient Sangha, where bhikkhus lived together in vihāras (monasteries), this discipline was necessary. It protects the peaceful and focused environment that monastics need in order to develop meditation (dhyāna) and wisdom (paññā). Poking and prodding can lead to disputes, emotional injury, and the destruction of harmony in the community of practice.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.