San Lo Bu Pm Pc 67Tickling
Pāli / Sanskrit:Aṅgulipatodaka
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Tickling — Aṅgulipatodaka
Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit | San Lo Bu Pm Pc 67
---
Source Status
The full Sanskrit source text for this entry has not yet been directly compared within the Inti Dharma system. The explanation below is not a translation of the original scripture, but an analysis and explanation based purely on the supplied descriptive information, including: the Sectarian Canon tradition — Comparative, the Comparative Sanskrit Vinaya collection, serial number Pc 67, the Vietnamese title Cù Lét, the English title Tickling, and the Pāli/Sanskrit title Aṅgulipatodaka. Any statements about detailed content, specific teachings, or related circumstances are not added if they are not present in the descriptive information. Readers should consult the original text from specialized academic sources for accurate comparison.
---
Background
This entry belongs to the Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit, a collection of disciplinary provisions in the Sectarian Canon — Comparative tradition. This is a form of Vinaya material recorded and transmitted in Sanskrit, reflecting the differentiation and diversity in the systematization of discipline among various Buddhist schools after the period of early Buddhism. The method of "comparison" suggests that this material was compiled or studied comparatively among different Vinaya recensions, helping scholars and practitioners recognize similarities and differences in how the schools regulated the conduct of the Sangha.
The abbreviation Pc in the code San Lo Bu Pm Pc 67 usually indicates the group of rules concerning conduct that requires confession, that is, a lighter class of precepts compared with the grave rules. The number 67 shows that this is the sixty-seventh rule in that group, belonging to the section for Bhikkhus (Bu, an abbreviation of Bhikkhu) and possibly related to a system of disciplinary rules compared according to the Pratimokṣa (Pm) method.
---
Content Identifiable From the Descriptive Information
The title of this entry, Aṅgulipatodaka in Pāli/Sanskrit, Tickling in English, and Cù Lét in Vietnamese, gives a clear indication of the object regulated by this rule.
The word Aṅgulipatodaka may be analyzed semantically as follows:
- Aṅguli or Aṅgula: finger.
- Patodaka or Patoda: poking, stimulation by touch, prodding.
Combined, the term means poking or tickling with the finger, that is, the deliberate act of using the finger to tickle another person. In the context of the Vinaya, rules of this group often regulate acts that, though not morally grave, are unsuitable to the deportment of one gone forth, giving rise to disturbance, laughter, or lack of solemnity in the Sangha.
The act of tickling, though it may appear trivial in worldly eyes, when occurring in the environment of the Sangha may violate the principles of deportment (ācāra), bodily self-control (kāyasamācāra), and mutual respect among members of the monastic community. This is the common spirit of the provisions concerning conduct requiring admonition and confession in the Vinaya of many schools.
---
Meaning for Practice
The presence of a specific provision concerning tickling in the Vinaya system shows the comprehensive and refined vision of the elders in constructing the monastic way of life. No bodily or verbal act is considered too petty to be regulated if it can affect the harmony, dignity, and purity of the life of brahmacariya.
From the standpoint of practice, this reminds practitioners of several basic points:
1. Bodily conduct must be guarded: Every movement of the body, however small, falls within the scope of mindfulness and self-control. The act of tickling another often arises from a relaxed, uncollected mind or a mind fond of joking, states incompatible with the life of meditation and renunciation.
2. Respect the body and mind of those sharing the holy life: Touching another person’s body without a legitimate reason, even in jest, may violate personal boundaries and cause unease or loss of concentration for the recipient.
3. Deportment is an expression of the mind: In the Buddhist tradition, outward deportment and the inner mind always have a reciprocal relationship. Maintaining deportment is not an outward formality, but the natural expression of a mind that has been trained and settled.
4. Small does not mean insignificant: Vinaya teachers often emphasize that it is precisely small things, if not attended to, that gradually wear down the quality of the life of practice.
---
Comparative Note
Because the full Sanskrit text of the Aṅgulipatodaka entry in this Comparative Vinaya collection has not been established through direct comparison in the present system, researchers wishing to understand the corresponding provision more deeply may consult the Vinaya texts of the schools preserved in the Chinese canon, Tibetan canon, or related Pāli texts, while also consulting comparative Vinaya studies by international Buddhist studies specialists in order to gain a more comprehensive view of the position and meaning of this rule within the entire comparative Pratimokṣa system.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.