Lzh Mi Bu Pm Sk 44Covering the Head (2nd)

Covering the Head (Second) — AI Exposition

Lzh Mi Bu Pm Sk 44 | Dutiyaoguṇṭhita
Comparative Vinaya — Chinese | Sectarian Canonical Tradition · Comparative

---

Source Status

The full source text of this Vinaya item has not yet been directly collated in the system. The exposition below is constructed entirely on the basis of the supplied descriptive information, including: the sectarian tradition, collection title, identifying code, Vietnamese title, English title, and Pāli name Dutiyaoguṇṭhita. There is no detailed content of the training rule, no original wording, and no accompanying commentary. Readers and practitioners should consult the Chinese source text or reliable sectarian Vinaya sources directly for complete evidence.

---

Background

This item belongs to the Comparative Vinaya — Chinese, a type of scholarly material intended to compare and collate training rules among different Buddhist schools. This is an analytical research work, not the unitary Vinaya of a single school, but a systematic collection of corresponding training rules from multiple traditions, compiled so that students may see similarities and differences among the schools.

The Pāli name of this training rule is Dutiyaoguṇṭhita, in which:

• Dutiya (Pāli: dutiya) means “second,” clearly indicating that this is the second occurrence of a training rule related to the act of “covering the head” within the same school or same group of training rules.
• Oguṇṭhita (Pāli: oguṇṭhita) means “covered,” “wrapped,” or “veiled,” and is often used to refer to the state of covering the head or veiling the face.

The code Sk 44 suggests that this training rule belongs to the Sekhiya group, rules on deportment and proper conduct, which regulate the correct manner of behavior for renunciants in everyday situations such as going for alms, eating, communicating with the public, wearing robes, and maintaining bodily deportment.

---

Content Identifiable from the Descriptive Information

Based on its title and position within the classification system, the training rule Dutiyaoguṇṭhita — Covering the Head (Second) very likely regulates not covering the head in certain circumstances, or conversely the proper way to cover the head in a specific context.

In traditional Buddhist Vinayas, the Sekhiya rules on deportment often set forth two aspects: (1) one should not do something when entering a village, going among crowds, or standing before donors; and (2) one should keep body, speech, and mind in a dignified state, not careless or unrestrained. The act of “covering the head” or “veiling the face” while going for alms or taking food is often regarded as lacking in deportment, concealing the appearance of a practitioner in an unsuitable way, or showing inattentiveness unworthy of the dignity of a bhikkhu.

The fact that this training rule appears a second time, as the title clearly indicates, shows either that there are two distinct situations related to the same action, or that this is a comparison between two schools with equivalent training rules on the content of “covering the head.” In the context of the Comparative Vinaya, it is likely a comparison of a training rule between two different Vinaya systems, both regulating the behavior of covering the head by renunciants, though they may differ in scope of application, level of sanction, or wording.

---

Meaning for Practice and Study

The Sekhiya training rules in general, and rules concerning bodily deportment in particular, reflect a deep principle in Buddhism: bodily teaching is Dharma teaching. Practitioners do not practice only inwardly, but also express their cultivation through every gesture, every step, every manner of wearing robes and holding the body in daily life.

Not covering the head casually when in contact with the public carries the meaning of:

• Transparency and non-concealment: A renunciant lives a clear life and has no need to hide; the body appearing plainly before the public is an expression of non-deceit.
• Respect for donors: When receiving offerings, the bhikkhu maintains a dignified and open attitude, not concealing the face like someone with something to hide.
• Restraint of the sense doors: Deportment is a tool for gathering in the mind, helping the practitioner not become distracted but remain fully present in each moment.

Comparative study of training rules among schools, as in this Comparative Vinaya, also has important meaning for practice and study: it helps practitioners and scholars see that the basic spirit of the precepts is unified across traditions, even though language and expression differ according to time and region.

---

Comparative Note

Because the full Chinese source text of the training rule Lzh Mi Bu Pm Sk 44 has not been directly collated in the system, all analysis here is only general, based on the title and classificatory position. Serious researchers should consult the corresponding Chinese text and compare it further with surviving sectarian Vinaya systems in order to gain an accurate and comprehensive view of the content, scope of application, and transmission history of this training rule.