Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mi Bi Vb Np 15An Almsbowl With Fewer Than Five Mends

Pāli / Sanskrit:Ūnapañcabandhana

📖283 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

The Sutta on an Almsbowl With Fewer Than Five Mends (Ūnapañcabandhana)

Background

This passage belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka, the first division of the Tipiṭaka, and lies within the Bhikkhunī Vibhaṅga or Bhikkhu Vinaya, in the Vibhaṅga analysis of the lesser rules (Pācittiya). This tradition was transmitted from the Buddha in the sixth century BCE and holds a central place in Theravāda Buddhism.

The background of this rule concerns the use and maintenance of the almsbowl (pātra), an essential implement of bhikkhus and bhikkhunīs in the life of practice. The almsbowl is not only a vessel for food, but also a symbol of purity, diligence, and restraint in one gone forth. Thus, the rule about maintaining an almsbowl reflects a deep Buddhist principle: use only what is necessary, and avoid wastefulness and heedlessness.

Main Content

This rule governs how to deal with an almsbowl that is damaged or needs repair. In particular, if an almsbowl is damaged, broken, or cracked, and the number of mends is fewer than five, that is, "ūnapañcabandhana," then the bhikkhu or bhikkhunī may continue to use that almsbowl without violating the rule. However, once the number of mends reaches five or more, the almsbowl must be set aside or no longer used.

This expresses a balance between two principles: first, economy and non-waste, since what can still be used should still be used; and second, purity and the need for clear boundaries, since an almsbowl that is too old or has been repaired too many times loses its purity and practical function. This rule also reflects the Buddha’s practicality: the founder of Buddhism did not require unnecessary harshness, but he also did not allow laxity.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản tóm lược AI · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.