Lzh Mi Bi Pm Sk 80Finding Fault
Pāli / Sanskrit:Ujjhānasaññī
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
An Explanation of the Ujjhānasaññī Discourse (Finding Fault)
Background
The Ujjhānasaññī discourse is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Pāli Canon, the most basic layer of teaching on practice in early Buddhism. This discourse was recorded in the context of the recensions transmitted in the first centuries after the Buddha’s nirvana, when the Sangha needed to define the boundary between moral fault and serious violation of the precepts.
Ujjhānasaññī is translated from Pāli: ujjhāna (criticism, fault-finding) and saññī (one who has a perception, one who considers). This discourse deals with the problem of ascetics who tend to criticize and find fault in others, a conduct that can divide the Sangha community and obstruct common practice.
In the context of the Vinaya Piṭaka, the discourse is not a philosophical doctrine but concrete guidance for action. It reflects the reality of the monastic community: not everyone has a wholesome intention, not every fault is worthy of public criticism, and the way one approaches fault-finding can lead either to gladness or to division.
Main Content
The Ujjhānasaññī discourse concerns the attitude and method a renunciant should apply when discovering improper conduct in the community. Rather than seeking out faults in a spirit of criticism or contempt, the practitioner should examine the true motive of the other person.
The discourse emphasizes that proper criticism must be based on three fundamental factors of the Vinaya Piṭaka: cakkhu (clear vision), sīla (pure morality), and samādhi (collected mind). It also warns that one who habitually finds fault in others often carries within himself a tendency toward conceit, which obstructs humility and compassion.
According to the Pāli Canon, public criticism should be undertaken only when: (1) the fault is real; (2) the motive is for the common welfare of the Sangha, not because of anger or the desire to gain fame; (3) the manner is discreet, friendly, and directed toward correction, not punishment or humiliation.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.