Lzh Mg Bu Pm Ss 9Making an Accusation Out of Anger on an Irrelevant Pretext
Pāli / Sanskrit:Aññabhāgiya
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Aññabhāgiya Sutta: A Groundless Accusation Made Out of Anger
Background
The Aññabhāgiya Sutta is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka, a particularly important division of the Pāli Canon, which sets forth the rules of discipline for the Buddhist Sangha. This text represents a specific case within the Pātimokkha (the fundamental rules of training), reflecting real situations that arose within the earliest monastic community.
The historical context shows that, in the years immediately following the Buddha's passing into Nirvana, the Sangha expanded rapidly. This led to conflicts involving the temperaments, mental dispositions, and conduct of its members. The Aññabhāgiya records a typical situation: a monk, stirred by anger or jealousy, brings an accusation against another monk that is based not on truth but on a "trivial, irrelevant pretext" (aññabhāgiya — meaning "belonging to a different matter, unrelated").
The Vinaya Piṭaka was compiled not merely to impose punishment, but for spiritual education. Each rule has a profound ethical and psychological basis.
Principal Content
The principle of Aññabhāgiya concerns the offense of making a false or groundless accusation. Specifically, when a monk declares that another monk has violated a certain rule of training, but the real reason behind this is anger, jealousy, or some other impure motivation, the accusing monk commits an offense.
The issue does not lie in whether the accusation itself is true or false. The issue lies in the impure motivation (akusala cetanā) underlying the act. If someone brings an accusation under the pretense of "upholding the Vinaya," when in reality it stems from personal animosity, this constitutes a form of spiritual dishonesty.
This rule teaches that accusations must be brought with a pure state of mind, for the purpose of protecting the Sangha and the True Dharma. If a monk genuinely discovers that another monk has transgressed the rules of training, making that known is both right and necessary.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.