Ka Bu Pm Ss 9Making an Accusation Out of Anger on an Irrelevant Pretext
Pāli / Sanskrit:Aññabhāgiya
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Aññabhāgiya Sutta: Accusation on an Irrelevant Pretext from an Angry Mind
Background
The Aññabhāgiya Sutta belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda tradition, recorded in the Khandhaka, or Group Section. The context of this discourse arises from incidents in the early monastic community, when bhikkhus began to misuse the rules of discipline to punish fellow practitioners for personal reasons rather than substantive reasons.
The Buddha saw that certain bhikkhus gave rise to resentment and anger toward companions, then exploited minor conduct as a pretext to accuse them of violating the discipline. This not only damaged harmony in the Sangha, but also corrupted the nature of practicing the discipline. Therefore, the Buddha promulgated a Pātimokkha rule for such cases, in order to restore the purity of the discipline.
Main Content
The Aññabhāgiya Sutta identifies a specific situation: a bhikkhu, out of anger or hatred toward another, discovers or declares that the other has violated the discipline. However, this accusation is made on the basis of aññabhāgiya in Pāli, meaning “belonging to something else” or “not directly connected,” that is, the stated reason for accusation is not the real issue but only a pretext.
For example, a bhikkhu may say, “That fellow practitioner has just spoken an evil word,” while in reality the reason he wants to accuse him is that earlier the other did not support him in another matter. This accusation is based on an “irrelevant reason” (aññabhāgiya).
The Buddha teaches that this act is a form of violation of the discipline, because it reflects lack of truthfulness (asaccavādi), lack of loving-kindness (avyābahatā), and the destruction of the Sangha’s unity. Any bhikkhu who abuses the disciplinary procedure of the Vinaya out of personal resentment is considered to have violated the Pātimokkha.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.