Lzh Mg Bu Pm Pc 59Raising a Hand

Raising a Hand — AI Interpretation (Lzh Mg Bu Pm Pc 59)

---

Source Status

This scripture entry belongs to the Comparative Vinaya — Chinese collection, within the tradition of Sectarian Canonical Texts · Comparative, bearing the reference code Lzh Mg Bu Pm Pc 59, with the Vietnamese title Giơ Tay, the English title Raising a Hand, and the Pāli technical term Talasattika. At present, the corresponding full Chinese-language source text has not been directly collated, and no Vietnamese translation from the original scripture is available within the system.

This interpretive presentation is therefore not a translation of the original scripture, but rather an exposition of context and meaning based purely on the supplied descriptive information, in conjunction with general knowledge of the structure of sectarian Vinaya literature. Readers should bear this in mind and consult the original text whenever the opportunity to access it arises.

---

Background

This entry falls within the framework of the Comparative Vinaya — Chinese, a category of scholarly material that compiles and compares the Vinaya rules of various Buddhist schools as transmitted in the Chinese textual corpus. The code Bu indicates that this is a training rule pertaining to bhikkhus (fully ordained monks). The code Pm Pc corresponds to the category of Pācittiya (Bō-dật-đề) — that is, training rules belonging to the group of minor offenses requiring confession, not grave offenses entailing loss of ordination. The number 59 identifies this as the fifty-ninth Pācittiya rule within this comparative system.

The Pāli term Talasattika — compounded from tala (palm of the hand, a flat surface) and sattika (armed, pertaining to striking or assault) — evokes the act of using the palm of the hand or the gesture of raising the hand in a threatening or offensive manner. In the context of comparative Vinaya collections, a training rule bearing the name Talasattika typically prescribes that a bhikkhu must not raise his hand, swing his hand, or use his hand as a gesture of threat, anger, or violence toward another person — particularly in situations of dispute or conflict within the Sangha or with laypeople.

---

Content Determinable from Descriptive Information

From the name Talasattika and its position within the Pācittiya section, several general points that this training rule addresses may be identified:

Regarding the regulated conduct: This training rule establishes a standard of bodily conduct for the renunciant — specifically the gesture of raising the hand in the sense of intimidation, challenge, or with intent to harm another. In the communal life of bhikkhus, bodily gestures carry great significance, and a coarse gesture can destroy harmony, cause fear, or diminish the dignity of one who has gone forth.

Regarding the sectarian comparative context: Since this material belongs to the Comparative Vinaya — Chinese system, this fifty-ninth training rule may be presented in parallel or compared with analogous regulations in numerous Vinaya texts of different schools, such as the Dharmaguptaka Vinaya (Sìfēnlǜ), the Mahīśāsaka Vinaya (Wǔfēnlǜ), the Sarvāstivāda Vinaya (Shísònglǜ), and the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya, among others. Each school may present minor differences in how the conduct is defined, the gravity of the offense, or the exceptional cases recognized.

Regarding the typical structure of a Pācittiya rule: Ordinarily, a Pācittiya rule comprises: the origin narrative (an event that led the Buddha to promulgate the rule), the formal rule statement, analysis of each constituent element of the offense, and enumeration of cases involving an offense and cases involving no offense. However, since the descriptive information provides no further detail, it is not possible to affirm which specific elements are present in the corresponding Chinese-language source.

---

Significance for Practice

The training rule Talasattika — regardless of which Vinaya text it is read from — reflects a core principle of Buddhist monastic discipline: the bodily conduct of one who has gone forth must be entirely free from aggression, threat, or violation. This is not merely a matter of social courtesy or outward deportment, but an expression of maturity in the practice of bodily karma — one of the three karmas of body, speech, and mind.

The gesture of raising the hand with intent to threaten or offend arises from the foundation of anger and inner disturbance. The promulgation of this training rule reminds practitioners that the regulation of bodily conduct is both a means and a measure of the regulation of the inner life. When a bhikkhu no longer responds with aggressive gestures even in circumstances of provocation, this is an expression of the perfection of patience (kṣānti-pāramitā) and the absence of a hostile mind.

At the level of the Sangha, this training rule protects a harmonious and safe environment for all members, especially those who may be more vulnerable within the community. In the broader social context, the peaceful gestures of one who has gone forth constitute a form of wordless teaching of the Dharma — a manifestation of the image of the Sangha as trustworthy and worthy of veneration.

Students of the precepts may reflect on this training rule not only in the narrow sense of hand gestures, but also extending to all bodily conduct of an intimidating or fear-inducing nature — a contemplative practice of continuing value in any context of Dharma cultivation.

---

Comparative Notes

Since the full Chinese-language source text corresponding to the entry Lzh Mg Bu Pm Pc 59 has not yet been directly collated, all interpretations in this document are general in character and derived from descriptive information. The Pāli technical term Talasattika is the primary basis for identifying the subject of this training rule. Researchers wishing to study the matter more deeply should consult directly the original Chinese-language texts within the sectarian Vinaya corpus, as well as the corresponding rules in the Vinaya collections that have been transmitted in complete form, in order to arrive at a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of the scope, conditions, and spirit of this training rule.