Lzh Mg Bu Pm Pc 53Intruding on a Couple Enjoying Themselves
Pāli / Sanskrit:Sabhojana
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Commentary on the Sabhojana Sutta
Background
The Sabhojana Sutta (Sabhojana Pācittiya) belongs to the Pātimokkha of the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically within the Pācittiya section — those rules that require confession and expiation when transgressed. It is one of the precepts governing the practice of monastics in the Theravāda tradition.
The origin story of this rule concerns a specific incident at a monastery during the time of the Buddha. A monk or nun, either inadvertently or deliberately, intruded upon a married couple who were sharing a meal together or engaged in the private affairs of their household. This action caused disruption, was considered discourteous, and violated the privacy of laypeople, thereby adversely affecting the reputation of the Sangha.
The Vinaya Piṭaka was set forth to protect the purity of the religious community and to educate practitioners in respect and proper conduct in the monastic life, especially in their interactions with laypeople. The Sabhojana rule reflects this need in a concrete and specific manner.
Principal Content
The prohibition in the Sabhojana rule stipulates that if a monk or nun, with deliberate intent, for personal advantage, or without legitimate reason, intrudes upon, disturbs, or inserts themselves between a married couple while they are together — whether at a meal or during other private moments — such a person commits an offense of Pācittiya.
In the spirit of the Vinaya Piṭaka, this action is regarded as thoughtlessness (avicāra), a failure to respect the proper boundary between religious life and the domestic life of laypeople. It reflects greed, inattentiveness, or even social ineptitude — qualities that a monk or nun should strive to overcome.
The distinction between an unintentional and an intentional act is of considerable importance in the Vinaya. If the transgression was unintentional, the practitioner is nonetheless required to disclose the matter and confess before the Sangha. If it was intentional, the consequences for one's practice are more grave. A Pācittiya offense is not among the most serious violations, yet it requires public acknowledgment before the community and the performance of expiation (pācittiya-patikamma).
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.