Lzh Mg Bi Pm Pc 85Sitting Without Permission
Pāli / Sanskrit:Anāpucchāabhinisīdana
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
The Anāpucchāabhinisīdana Sutta (Sitting Without Permission)
Context
This sutta belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda Buddhist tradition, recorded among the rules of conduct for the Sangha during the time when the Buddha was still present in the world. The Vinaya Piṭaka is not a collection of arbitrary prohibitions, but rather a standardization of behavior intended to protect the monastic community, maintain harmony, and cultivate the virtue of those who have gone forth into the homeless life.
During the period of the Buddha's propagation of the Dharma, monastics lived together in monasteries, sharing communal spaces for their residence. Regulations concerning the use of seats, chairs, and dwelling places were practical matters, reflecting mutual respect and collective discipline. This sutta addresses a specific situation: a monastic who sits in another's seat without first asking permission thereby causes a breakdown of cooperation within the community.
The Vinaya Piṭaka was composed so that the Buddha could govern the Sangha with wisdom—not through harshness but with compassion—gradually giving form to the enduring precepts and trainings that sustain the practice.
Main Content
The Anāpucchāabhinisīdana Sutta addresses the behavior of sitting in another's place without first asking permission. According to the sequence within the Pāli Vinaya Piṭaka, this behavior is regarded as a lack of respect—not only toward another's personal belongings, but also toward the personal autonomy and well-being of one's fellow practitioner.
When a monastic makes use of a seat, chair, or any communal property without the consent of its owner, this gives rise to a state of potential conflict. The one whose place has been taken may feel that their rights have been infringed upon; laypeople dwelling nearby may observe a loss of order within the monastic community; and the Sangha loses the unity of purpose necessary for communal practice.
According to the Pāli Vinaya Piṭaka (Pācittiya), this behavior is classified as an offense requiring confession (Pācittiya Pātimokkha). The Buddha did not entirely prohibit the use of communal property, but required that monastics first ask permission before doing so, thereby expressing respect and cooperation.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.