Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Ka Bu Pm Sk 86Holding a Knife

Pāli / Sanskrit:Satthapāṇi

📖1,012 words · ~4 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Source Status

This entry is an AI interpretation based on the provided descriptive information: code Ka Bu Pm Sk 86, the Vietnamese title “Cầm Dao,” the English title “Holding a Knife,” the Pali title “Satthapāṇi,” belonging to the Chinese Comparative Vinaya. The truncated Vietnamese body text shows that the previous section discussed holding a sharp object in public, the image this may create of aggression, and the requirement to maintain a gentle, dignified attitude.

The data does not contain the full source text, the Chinese version, a complete translation, or commentary. Therefore, it is not possible to assert the details of the rule, the circumstances of its establishment, the persons involved, or practical exceptions. What follows is only an interpretation based on the available data, not a translation of the original Vinaya text.

Context

In the monastic life, deportment is not separate from the ethical message a practitioner expresses before society. A mendicant or bhikkhu does not keep precepts merely through declarations; he also communicates a way of non-harming through how he walks and stands, handles objects, and responds to circumstances. A knife or sharp object may be a necessary tool in ordinary life, but it is also a symbol that easily suggests violence, threat, killing, or self-defense by force. Therefore, holding a knife at the wrong time, in the wrong way, or for the wrong purpose can harm the peaceful image of a practitioner.

The title “Holding a Knife” and “Satthapāṇi” show that the focus lies on the hand holding a sharp implement. This does not necessarily mean that all contact with a knife is rejected in every circumstance; the descriptive information is insufficient for such a conclusion. What can be interpreted is that the Vinaya is concerned with carefulness when monastics hold objects that easily cause fear or misunderstanding. For a community that lives by faith, the perception of others is not a matter wholly dependent on appearances; it is connected with the purity of communal life.

Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information

From the descriptive information and the truncated ending, it can be determined that this entry concerns the act of holding a knife or an object equivalent to a knife. The truncated passage emphasized that holding a sharp object openly, especially with an inappropriate attitude, may cause outsiders to misunderstand Buddhists or the Sangha. The content that can be determined at a safe level is this: monastics should avoid threatening appearances, avoid holding sharp implements unnecessarily, and maintain a peaceful bearing in all contact with objects.

One should not add details such as the specific kind of knife, the place where the incident occurred, the penalty, or the story behind the establishment of the rule, because the data contains no such data. Nor should one assert that this entry teaches a general doctrine about all weapons in every tradition. Here, the title and truncated ending allow only a discussion of a training rule on deportment related to a hand holding a knife, with the focus on carefulness and non-harming.

The image of the “knife” may be extended symbolically in an interpretation for practice, provided it is not turned into specific scriptural content. A knife is an object capable of cutting, injuring, or causing fear. In the hand of someone lacking mindfulness, it becomes a sign of unease. When near others, it may frighten the timid, even if the one holding it has no ill intent. Thus, this training rule reminds us that outward conduct should be illuminated by loving-kindness and by consideration for the feelings of the community.

Meaning for Practice

The meaning for practice is first of all the cultivation of non-harming. Non-harming is not only refraining from killing; it is also not creating a stance, gesture, speech, or appearance that makes others feel threatened. A practitioner may have no wish to harm anyone, yet if careless in how he holds a knife, moves about, or appears among the community, he may still diminish faith. Thus, the Vinaya attends both to inner intention and to external effect.

This entry also teaches the harmony between means and the holy life. Some objects are not bad in themselves, yet they should not always appear in the hand of a practitioner. The simplicity of monastic life requires practitioners to know what is necessary, what is excessive, what should be done discreetly, and what conduct may cause misunderstanding. The wisdom of the Vinaya is not the rejection of all objects, but knowing how to use them for the right purpose, at the right time, and to the right extent.

At a deeper level, “holding a knife” also reminds us of the invisible blades in body, speech, and mind. Sharp speech can cut off faith. Judgmental thought can injure loving-kindness. A rigid, coercive attitude or the wish to defeat others is also a kind of implement in the hand of the self. Though this is a symbolic interpretation, it accords with the spirit of practice: a student of the Buddha should lay down not only externally harmful objects, but also the tendency to harm within the mind.

For laypeople, this lesson encourages carefulness in the use of power, tools, and language. What we hold in our hands can protect life, but it can also make others uneasy. Practice is the ability to recognize the weight of small actions and to choose a way of being present that brings peace.

Comparative Note

Because no full source text is present in the data, this section does not confirm the Chinese wording, does not cite a specific comparative source, and does not add the circumstances of the rule’s establishment. When verification becomes possible, item Ka Bu Pm Sk 86 should be compared to determine the scope of “Satthapāṇi,” the kind of object discussed, the situation of application, and how the Chinese version expresses it. Until such comparison is made, the most cautious understanding is to read this as a training rule on deportment concerning non-harming, a peaceful bearing, and the responsibility not to cause fear in others.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · VI: bản diễn giải AI sinh lại đầy đủ, chờ đối chiếu nguồn gốc · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.