Lzh Dg Bu Pm 2 Sk 99Holding a Knife
Pāli / Sanskrit:Satthapāṇi
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Commentary on the Satthapāṇi Sutta (Holding a Knife)
Background
The Satthapāṇi Sutta belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka, a core section of the Pāli Canon in the Theravāda tradition. The Vinaya Piṭaka records the rules of practice established by Śākyamuni Buddha for his monastic disciples, in order to protect the purity of the Sangha and maintain the true Dharma for a long time in the world.
This scripture records a specific incident: a monastic holding a knife (sattha) in the hand. This is not a trivial matter. In the context of the Theravāda Vinaya Piṭaka, every action of a monastic carries deep meaning, connected with spiritual cultivation and maintaining the image of one who practices the Buddha’s Dharma. The example of a monastic affects not only that person, but also strongly influences the surrounding lay Buddhist community, who regard the Sangha as the glory of the Three Jewels.
Main Content
The Satthapāṇi Sutta prescribes that monks and nuns are not permitted to hold or keep sharp instruments such as knives, swords, arrows, or similar weapons. This rule arises from a basic principle of Buddhism: preserving life (ahiṃsā) and staying far from violent states of mind or harmful actions.
When Śākyamuni Buddha discovered or was informed that a monastic was holding a knife, he made a decisive ruling prohibiting it. This may be a Pācittiya, a minor offense requiring confession, or a Dukkaṭa, an improper act, depending on the specific context and intention of that monastic. The rule is meant to ensure that monastics always maintain a dignified, peaceful appearance and do not arouse doubt or disturbance in the eyes of laypeople.
The Vinaya Piṭaka also records the deeper reason: sharp tools easily lead to accidental or intentional harm. Moreover, holding a knife may cause laypeople to question or lose respect for the Sangha.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.