Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Mi Bi Pm Sk 98Holding a Knife

Pāli / Sanskrit:Satthapāṇi

📖990 words · ~4 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Source Status

This entry currently has only descriptive information and a truncated tail of the Vietnamese text. There is no full Chinese source text, no complete comparative version, and no basis in the data for confirming each wording of the rule. Therefore, what follows is a cautious AI interpretation, based on the data provided: the Vietnamese title “Cầm Dao,” the English title “Holding a Knife,” the Pali name “Satthapāṇi,” the item number “Lzh Mi Bi Pm Sk 98,” and its belonging to the group of Chinese comparative Vinaya texts. It should not be regarded as a translation of the original scripture or as a commentary that has been academically collated.

The truncated passage indicates that the earlier style was explaining the holding of a knife as a conduct needing regulation in monastic life, because it relates to carefulness, non-harming, and the possibility of causing unease in the Sangha. These ideas accord with the general spirit of Buddhist Vinaya studies, but the specific details of the provision, cases of offense or non-offense, the degree of sanction, and the original terminology still cannot be confirmed from the data.

Context

In the renunciant life, the Vinaya does not regulate only major actions; it also enters into everyday gestures: holding, placing, handing over, using, preserving, or coming into contact with implements. A knife is an implement with a clear function and may be necessary in certain activities, but it is also a sharp object capable of causing injury. Thus, when the descriptive information gives the topic “Holding a Knife,” the central point may be understood not as the object itself, but as the attitude of the practitioner when coming into contact with an instrument that has the power to harm.

A community of practice needs peace and stability. Any conduct that makes others afraid, suspicious, or feel threatened can break the atmosphere of purity. In the Vinaya context, such regulations often help practitioners guard bodily karma, verbal karma, and mental karma right within small activities. Holding a knife, if done without mindfulness, may become an expression of heedlessness; if carried with an intention to threaten, it is further connected with anger, violent intention, and a lack of respect for life.

Content That Can Be Determined from the Descriptive Information

From the descriptive information, it can be determined that this entry belongs to the Chinese comparative Vinaya and concerns a rule about “holding a knife.” The Pali name “Satthapāṇi” suggests someone with a knife or holding a knife in hand, but the present data is insufficient to determine the entire context. It cannot be affirmed that the rule speaks about a specific event, a specific person, or any specific circumstance for the establishment of the rule.

The truncated tail allows one to recognize that the previous interpretation emphasized care when handling sharp tools. What can be stated cautiously is this: a practitioner should not hold a knife carelessly, should not use a knife to frighten others, and should not allow an object capable of injury to become a means for expressing an unwholesome mind. The idea of non-harming also appears in the tail, but it should be understood as an ethical interpretation, not as a verbatim quotation.

Because this is a Vinaya item, its practical meaning may lie in the training of deportment. A renunciant not only avoids actions that actually cause harm, but also avoids expressions that may be understood as threatening or lacking in loving-kindness. A knife held properly, used at the proper time, placed in the proper place, and not displayed ostentatiously can be an ordinary implement. But that very object, if joined with an irritable mind or unstable gestures, becomes a Vinaya concern.

Meaning for Practice

The lesson for practice here is alertness in actions that seem small. A practitioner does not wait until a great fault has occurred before turning back to look at the mind. As soon as one holds a sharp object, there is already an opportunity to practice knowing what one is doing, why one is doing it, whether anyone nearby is affected, and whether the mind is calm or agitated. Mindfulness is not a remote idea, but the capacity to be present in every gesture.

The topic “holding a knife” also reminds us that non-harming is not only refraining from killing. Non-harming is also not sowing fear, not increasing tension, and not using a dangerous appearance to dominate others. One who keeps the precepts must learn how to make one’s presence peaceful. When bodily conduct is restrained, those around easily give rise to confidence; when bodily conduct is unrestrained, even if no harm has yet been done, confidence may still be damaged.

Inwardly, a knife may be understood as a symbol of the power to cut off, but in Vinaya studies that symbol should not replace the practical meaning. What matters is that the practitioner knows how to distinguish between the necessary function of an implement and the attachment, anger, or display that may accompany it. To practice is to learn to use things without being led by things, to act without departing from awareness, and to preserve safety for oneself and for the community.

Collation Note

There is no data in the data for comparison with the full source text at source link. Therefore, the original Chinese wording, the classification of the provision, cases of exemption, or the specific degree of sanction cannot be confirmed. When collation becomes possible, the source text should be checked directly, comparing the title, key terms, and the passage describing the circumstance for establishing the rule, if present.

This interpretation is intended only to restore a complete Vietnamese text in the spirit seen in the truncated tail: dignified and practically applicable, but not claiming to be a translation. All details beyond the descriptive information have been presented at a general level, avoiding attribution to the scriptures or Vinaya of content that has not been verified.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · VI: bản diễn giải AI sinh lại đầy đủ, chờ đối chiếu nguồn gốc · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.