Ka Bu Pm Sk 49Na phuphukkāraka
Pāli / Sanskrit:Na phuphukkāraka
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Explanation of the Na Phuphukkāraka Sutta
Background
The Na Phuphukkāraka Sutta belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka in the Theravāda Pāli Canon, specifically within the Khandhakas of the Vinaya. This is not a Dharma discourse in the usual narrative sense, but a disciplinary regulation (Vinaya) given by the Buddha to govern the community of monks and nuns.
The content of Na Phuphukkāraka is related to rules concerning the management of Sangha property. The phrase “Na phuphukkāraka” may be understood as rules concerning property not to be shared, or restrictions on the use of common property. In the context of the Vinaya Piṭaka, the Buddha often gave detailed regulations to protect the purity of monks and nuns and to avoid disputes and craving arising from uncertainty about material things.
According to the Theravāda tradition, the Vinaya Piṭaka is regarded as an important foundation for maintaining the purity of the Sangha over thousands of years. Each rule has an origin story (nidāna) explaining why the Buddha gave that regulation, often beginning with incidents that occurred among bhikkhus or bhikkhunīs.
Main Content
The Na Phuphukkāraka Sutta belongs to the system of managing the property (bhoga) of the Sangha. In the Vinaya Piṭaka, property is divided into two main types: usable property (bhoga) and common property of the Sangha (sāmaggībhoga).
This rule relates to the principle that certain objects are not to be divided or privately possessed. The purpose is to avoid situations in which monastics begin to accumulate material things, give rise to greed, and thereby stray from the path of practice. At the same time, this ensures fairness and harmony in the Sangha, because if there is too great a difference in material possessions among members, jealousy and disputes can easily arise.
The Vinaya Piṭaka also clearly regulates the conditions under which property is considered “belonging to the Sangha,” when it is “individual property,” and how disputes are to be handled.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.