Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Ka Bu Pm Np 22An Almsbowl With Fewer Than Five Mends

Pāli / Sanskrit:Ūnapañcabandhana

📖317 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

The Ūnapañcabandhana Discourse: An Almsbowl With Fewer Than Five Repairs

Background

The Ūnapañcabandhana discourse belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka, in the Bhikkhunī Pācittiya section, the rules concerning offenses for nuns, within the Buddha’s subtle disciplinary code. This discourse deals with practical issues concerning the property of female monastics, specifically regulations related to the almsbowl, one of the essential requisites of those who train in the Buddha-Dharma.

The almsbowl is not an ordinary object. It represents simplicity, restraint, and nonattachment to material things. In the Theravāda tradition, the almsbowl is regarded as a lawful implement of daily life for bhikkhus and bhikkhunīs. When a bowl is damaged, its repair must follow specific regulations to ensure that the spirit of practice is not defiled by attachment or by excess in caring for material things.

Main Content

The discourse states that a bhikkhunī may use an almsbowl as long as it has fewer than five repairs (ūnapañcabandhana). When the bowl exceeds this threshold, the female monastic may not continue using it and must be given a new bowl or must relinquish the old bowl according to the proper procedure.

The key point of this regulation is the balance between practicality and symbolism. A bowl with too many repairs is not only less durable, but also reflects a mental attitude of excessive attachment to old material things. Conversely, the rule does not require a bhikkhunī to keep replacing the bowl with a new one, for that would create waste and attachment to new things. Thus, the limit of five repairs is a wise and practical marker.

This regulation also expresses the Buddha’s understanding of the monastic life. Those who have gone forth must live with basic requisites, but they need not deny them rigidly. The almsbowl still needs to be usable; when it is no longer usable, replacing it is reasonable and is not an act of disobedience.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.