Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Dg Bu Pm 2 Pd 4Receiving Food in a Dangerous Region

Pāli / Sanskrit:Catutthapāṭidesanīya

📖303 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Explanation of the Catutthapāṭidesanīya

The Fourth Declaration Rule

Background

The Catutthapāṭidesanīya (Pāli: Catuttha = fourth; Pāṭidesanīya = declaration rule) belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically to the Pāṭidesanīya section, rules by which bhikkhus must openly acknowledge violations before the Sangha. This code is recorded in the Vinaya collections of the Theravāda tradition, with the classification number Lzh Dg Bu Pm 2 Pd 4.

This discourse arose from events during the lifetime of the Buddha, when the Sangha discovered unsuitable conduct among certain bhikkhus. In particular, the context of a “dangerous region” refers to localities with harsh conditions or populations unfriendly to Buddhism, where bhikkhus could easily be exploited or cause misunderstanding if they were not careful in their conduct around food. The Buddha clearly established rules to protect both the purity of the bhikkhus and the honor of the Sangha.

Main Content

The fourth Pāṭidesanīya rule states that if any bhikkhu in a dangerous region recognizes that he has violated a rule, or could be misunderstood, even by the mere appearance of impropriety, he must openly declare it before the Sangha or before at least one fellow bhikkhu.

Specifically, the discourse lays down rules concerning the receiving of food under special conditions. In a dangerous region, bhikkhus should not receive food from unknown persons, or receive it in ways that may create suspicion, such as receiving it through a window, at night, or from persons who have been warned against. If a bhikkhu cannot avoid such a situation, he is required to declare it immediately so that the Sangha may know, thereby protecting the purity of the discipline.

The important point is that a Pāṭidesanīya is not a grave offense, unlike a Pārājika or Saṅghādisesa, but concerns matters that need to be made public in order to maintain transparency.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.