Lzh Dg Bu Pm 2 As 3Resolution Because of Past Insanity
Pāli / Sanskrit:Amūḷhavinaya
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
THE AMŪḶHAVINAYA DISCOURSE: RESOLUTION CONCERNING CONDUCT WHILE FORMERLY INSANE
Background
The Amūḷhavinaya discourse belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka of Theravāda Buddhism, the Vinaya section that establishes rules of training and governs the monastic community. The content of this discourse concerns the handling of a person’s errors when they were still deluded, had not yet followed the precepts, or had not clearly understood the teaching.
In the context of the Buddha’s establishment of legal discipline, the question of responsibility for conduct arose when a person performed improper actions without full awareness or because of delusion. This discourse reflects the wisdom of the Buddha Dharma in considering human situations, not applying rules mechanically but taking into account intention (cetana) and the mental state of the actor.
Main Content
The discourse handles the case in which a person, because they were still bound by delusion, performed an action that violated the Vinaya or was inconsistent with the teaching, and asks how it should be resolved. This is not complete exoneration, but a recognition of the degree of fault and the reasonable way to handle it within the Saṅgha.
According to the Vinaya tradition, intention (cetana) is the determining factor in the gravity of an offense. An act performed in a state of complete delusion or without understanding its consequences is considered differently from an act done with deliberate intent to transgress. Yet delusion is not a reason for complete exemption; the person still must recognize and correct the matter.
This discourse also reflects the compassion of the Buddha and the Saṅgha in educating those who are still unclear about the teaching. Rather than imposing a heavy penalty immediately, the first priority is to help them gain clarity, guiding them to understand the precepts and the meaning of training, so that they voluntarily preserve them rather than being forced.
Practical Meaning
The Amūḷhavinaya discourse teaches that in the process of practice, we should not be too harsh with ourselves when we make mistakes through incomplete understanding. Yet that reason is not a basis for laxity in practice, but a foundation for consciously raising our awareness and becoming clearer.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.