Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Theravāda — Pali Canon · Vinaya Piṭaka — The Discipline Basket

Bu Ss 44. Encouraging a woman to satisfy one’s desires

Pāli / Sanskrit:Attakāmpāricariya

📖293 words · ~1 min read
2
Summary

A lustful monk who recommends to a woman that they have sexual intercourse is to be suspended.

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Attakāmpāricariya: Advice on Desire and the Penalty of Suspension

Background

This rule is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the section pertaining to the Bhikkhuṇī Saṃyutta (matters relating to the bhikkhunīs), and reflects an actual situation that arose within the Saṅgha during the early period. The regulations in the Vinaya Piṭaka were not established in abstract theory, but arose from specific events, the transgressions of monastics, and the guidance of the Buddha.

Attakāmpāricariya means "seeking the satisfaction of one's own desires." This text addresses a serious case involving the violation of celibacy (Brahmacarya) by a bhikkhu — not only on account of the transgressive act itself, but because he actively solicited a woman to participate in sexual conduct. This is a particularly grave violation because it encompasses an ethical dimension: inciting another person to transgress a precept.

Principal Content

According to the regulations in the Vinaya, a bhikkhu who harbors sensual desire (kāma-rāga) and actively entreats a woman, saying "please satisfy my desires" or "please engage in intercourse with me," is subject to the penalty of Parivāsa (suspension, ordinarily three months in such a case). The penalty of Parivāsa does not constitute removal from the Saṅgha, but rather a strict probationary period with certain restrictions imposed upon the offender.

An important point to note is that the Vinaya Piṭaka clearly distinguishes between degrees of transgression. An act of "seeking satisfaction for oneself" that the Buddha did not absolutely prohibit (when no involvement from another party is present) incurs a lighter penalty. However, advising or soliciting another person to participate is an altogether different matter — it indicates a lack of self-restraint, the "drawing of another" onto a wrong path, and the potential for harm to the community of practice.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.