Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Theravāda — Pali Canon · Vinaya Piṭaka — The Discipline Basket

Bu Sk 5353. Licking the almsbowl

Pāli / Sanskrit:Pattanillehaka

📖291 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Licking the Almsbowl: A Minor Action and the Monastic Code

Background

The Pattanillehaka (Licking the Almsbowl) appears in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically among the regulations governing Buddhist monastics. The Vinaya Piṭaka records the rules of discipline for monks (bhikkhus) and nuns (bhikkhunis), forming the foundation of the Saṅgha in the Theravāda tradition. This text concerns a particular situation regarding proper conduct with the almsbowl used to receive donated food.

In the contemplative life of monastics, the almsbowl (patta) is not merely a physical implement for receiving alms, but also a symbol of humility, self-restraint, and grateful acknowledgment of the generosity of lay supporters. Every action connected with this vessel carries deep instructive significance. Accordingly, the Buddha and the Saṅgha established clear regulations to protect the discipline and the spiritual integrity of the monastic community.

Main Content

The Pattanillehaka records an incident in which a monk licked his almsbowl after eating his meal. This action, though at first glance appearing minor and harmless, nonetheless transgressed the principles of the Vinaya that the Buddha had established for the Saṅgha.

The principal reason for prohibiting the licking of the almsbowl is that such an act is regarded as conduct falling below the proper standard (apariyatti-sīla). First, licking the bowl reveals greed and attachment to food—faults that a monastic must strive to overcome. Second, this action may undermine the confidence of lay donors, as it manifests an undignified and unseemly demeanor. Third, it reflects an incomplete mastery of the senses and of desires, which stands contrary to the aim of Buddhist practice.

When the matter was brought before the Buddha, he took the occasion to teach on the Vinaya—the rule of discipline—and to clearly establish standards of conduct for the entire Saṅgha.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.