Bi Pc 22. Removing pubic hair
Pāli / Sanskrit:Sambādhaloma
A nun who removes hair from the armpits or the groin must confess the offense.
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Theravāda Collection on Monastic Law The Nuns’ Analysis
The chapter on offenses entailing confession The subchapter on garlic 2. Removing pubic hair
Origin story
At one time the Buddha was staying at Sāvatthī in the Jeta Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s Monastery. At that time the nuns from the group of six removed the hair from their private parts. They then bathed naked at a ford in the river Aciravatī together with sex workers. The sex workers complained and criticized them, “How can the nuns remove the hair from their private parts? They’re just like householders who indulge in worldly pleasures!”
The nuns heard the complaints of those sex workers, and the nuns of few desires complained and criticized them, “How can the nuns from the group of six remove the hair from their private parts?” … “Is it true, monks, that those nuns do that?”
“It’s true, sir.”
The Buddha rebuked them, “How can the nuns from the group of six do that? This will affect people’s confidence …” … “And, monks, the nuns should recite this training rule like this:
Final ruling
‘If a nun removes hair from her private parts, she commits an offense entailing confession.’”
Definitions
A: whoever … Nun: … The nun who has been given the full ordination in unanimity by both Sanghas through a legal procedure consisting of one motion and three announcements that is irreversible and fit to stand—this sort of nun is meant in this case. The private parts: both armpits and the groin. Removes: if she removes one hair, she commits an offense entailing confession. Even if she removes many hairs, she commits one offense entailing confession.
Non-offenses
There is no offense: if she does it because she is sick; if she is insane; if she is the first offender.
The second training rule is finished.
The “…” is an abbreviation carried over from the Pāli original itself, called peyyāla. The early canon was memorized and recited, so passages repeated verbatim from a preceding discourse were commonly contracted to an elision mark rather than written out in full. Venerable Thích Minh Châu's translation preserves this convention. Some texts therefore look short — but that is the canonical form, not missing content or a truncated translation. The elided passages can be read in full in the preceding discourses of the same chapter.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.