Bi Pc 159159. Criticizing a robe distribution
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dubbala
If a nun, acting as part of a complete Order, gives away a robe to an official of the Order, but then criticizes the act, she must confess the offense.
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
The Rule on Criticizing a Robe Distribution (Dubbala)
Background
This rule belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka in the Theravāda tradition, specifically the Bhikkhunī Pātimokkha—the code of discipline for bhikkhunīs (nuns). The Vinaya Piṭaka records the historical occasions on which the Buddha established rules to govern the Sangha. Each rule typically arises from a specific incident: a bhikkhunī or bhikkhu transgresses proper conduct, the Buddha comes to know of it, and then establishes a rule to prevent similar behavior in the future.
The Dubbala rule (Dubbala Pātimokkha Samvarasikkhāpada) concerns the distribution of the sanghāṭī robe—one of the three basic robes of a Buddhist monastic—and criticism relating to that distribution. The context arises from conflicts within the community of nuns, where members of the Bhikkhunī Sangha hold a share in the communal property of the monastery, including robes.
Main Content
According to this rule, when the Bhikkhunī Sangha (the complete community of nuns) carries out a distribution of sanghāṭī robes to a designated person (an ārāmika or monastery attendant), the bhikkhunīs who participate in that act are considered to have a share in the collective action. However, if after the distribution a nun then voices criticism of that action—saying that the distribution was improper, unfair, or in violation of the rules—that nun incurs an offense requiring confession (āpatti).
This offense is classified as such because it involves an inconsistency between action and speech. The bhikkhunī had agreed to or participated in the collective decision, yet afterward criticized what she herself had sanctioned. This is a form of transgression related to "dubbala"—meaning "weak" or "unstable"—because such conduct reflects a lack of resolution, a failure of commitment, or a betrayal of the community's trust.
Practical Significance
This Vinaya rule teaches profound lessons regarding integrity (sīla) and the observance of communal agreements (samaya pālana).
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.