Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan

Xct Mu Bu Vb Pc 10Annoyance

Pāli / Sanskrit:Vilekhana

📖302 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Exposition of the Vilekhana Sutta (Annoyance)

Background

The Vilekhana Sutta appears in the Pācittiya section of the Vinaya Piṭaka, establishing the system of conduct for bhikkhunīs. The background for establishing a rule is usually connected with a specific event: a bhikkhunī committed an act that caused annoyance to others, leading the Buddha to lay down a rule to protect harmony in the Sangha.

The term “vilekhana” in Pāli means scraping, polishing, or causing unease; here it refers to actions that cause discouragement or annoyance to fellow practitioners. This is a minor offense (pācittiya: a fault requiring confession and acknowledgment), reflecting the subtlety of Theravāda discipline, where not only major harmful acts are forbidden, but also actions that affect the mental state of the monastic community are carefully considered.

In the context of a monastery or place of practice, where concentration, stillness, and wakefulness are necessary conditions, annoying actions disrupt this environment. Therefore, this rule was established as part of the Pācittiya rules, minor regulations directed toward refinement in conduct and reverence (saddahā).

Main Content

The Vilekhana Sutta forbids actions that cause annoyance or discouragement to others in the community of bhikkhunīs. The specific interpretation may relate to noisy tasks, loud sounds, or similar actions that affect the quiet necessary for meditation and training.

The content of the rule not only sets out the prohibited behavior, but also excludes from the scope of the rule cases with a valid reason. For example, if the work is necessary for maintaining the monastery or serving the discipline, then it is not an offense. This shows that the Vinaya Piṭaka is not imposed mechanically, but always considers the context and purpose of the action.

Violation of this rule requires certain conditions: the action must be performed intentionally, and another person must feel annoyed.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.