Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan

Xct Mu Bu Vb Pc 1Lying

Pāli / Sanskrit:Musāvāda

📖295 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

The Discourse on Lying (Musāvāda)

Exposition from the Traditional Theravāda Vinaya

Background

The section on Lying (Musāvāda) is recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Pātimokkha, the code of rules for bhikkhus. This is the earliest monastic legal text of Theravāda Buddhism, taught by the Buddha to the monastic community after the establishment of the Sangha.

The Musāvāda discourse is not an independent sermon but a precept (sīla) listed in the Pātimokkha system, with rules ranging from light to heavy. In Theravāda Buddhism, the act of lying is regarded as a consciously intentional act of deceit (pakati sācittaka), meaning that there must be an intention to deceive in order to bring about a harmful result.

Main Content

In the Pātimokkha, the rule concerning Musāvāda (lying) is considered in light of the Five Basic Precepts (Pañca Sīlā) that all Buddhists should observe. Specifically, “abstaining from false speech” (musāvādā veramaṇī) is one of the most fundamental precepts.

According to the Buddha’s teaching in the Pāli Canon, lying is defined as speaking words that are untrue with the intention of causing others to misunderstand or be harmed. Especially in a monastery (saṅghārāma), lying is a serious violation of the common order (saṅgha sthiti) and of trust among bhikkhus.

The Pātimokkha distinguishes between degrees of offense: from simple dishonest speech to false statements about Dharma practice or about supernormal powers (iddhi). An offense connected with “lying” may lead to different penalties depending on the context and severity of the act, from admonition (tajjanīya) to separation from the monastic community (parivāsa).

However, Theravāda Buddhism also recognizes special cases, for example “white lies” (miccā vāca) being permitted in circumstances where they protect another person’s life or protect the Sangha, although such speech still brings karmic results.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.