Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan

Xct Mu Bu Pm Pc 2Abusive Speech

Pāli / Sanskrit:Omasavāda

📖273 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

The Rule on Insulting Speech (Omasavāda)

Background

Omasavāda is a dhamma recorded in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda tradition, specifically within the Pātimokkha, the basic code for bhikkhus. This content reflects the Buddha’s deep concern for speech, one of the fields in which the human mind most easily falls into the unwholesome.

The history of the formation of rules concerning insulting speech is rooted in specific events in the early Sangha community. As the Sangha grew, conflicts among members increased, and rude, anonymous, or directly insulting words caused harm to harmony and shared practice. The Buddha therefore established specific rules to protect the spiritual environment and maintain concord in the Sangha.

This rule belongs among the regulations for ending disputes and conflicts, serving the ultimate aim of supporting the liberation of all members of the Sangha.

Main Content

Omasavāda, from the Pāli, means “abusive speech” or “insulting speech.” In the Pātimokkha, this rule prohibits bhikkhus from speaking rude, sarcastic, or harshly and publicly critical words, especially toward fellow practitioners or members of the community.

The rule clearly defines the prohibited act: when a bhikkhu speaks words intended to hurt, or insulting words containing ridicule, mockery, or attacks on character. This is prohibited not only in relation to those who practice the same discipline, but also in relation to anyone with whom the bhikkhu has contact.

The Omasavāda rule is classified among blameworthy actions in the disciplinary categories, corresponding to a light to moderate level of offense. For each violation, the bhikkhu must acknowledge the fault before the Sangha or before bhikkhus who witnessed it, depending on the specific circumstances.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.