Xct Mu Bu Pm Pc 35Encouraging Another Monastic to Eat More After Refusing an Invitation
Pāli / Sanskrit:Dutiyapavāraṇā
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Explanation of the Dutiyapavāraṇā Rule
Encouraging Another Monastic to Eat More After Refusing an Invitation
Background
The Dutiyapavāraṇā rule is found in the Pācittiya section of the Vinaya Piṭaka, a core component of monastic discipline in the Theravāda tradition. The word “Dutiya” means “second,” while “pavāraṇā” indicates an act of invitation or encouragement. This rule appears in the context of managing the daily life of monastics, especially matters of food and communal courtesy.
In Theravāda Buddhism, rules concerning eating are not harsh constraints but are intended to build a spirit of restraint, self-mastery, and mutual respect. The Pācittiya rules, lighter offenses requiring confession, are built upon a foundation of humanity and wisdom in communal governance. The Dutiyapavāraṇā rule concerns a specific situation in which a monk or nun refuses an invitation to eat the first time and is then invited again a second time.
Main Content
According to the Vinaya Piṭaka, when a monastic refuses an invitation to eat (pavāraṇā), it is often an expression of self-control or due to health or practice-related reasons. However, if another practitioner continues encouraging that person to eat more after the refusal, this must be considered wisely. This rule addresses when a second encouragement becomes an act inconsistent with the nature of monastic discipline.
In general, if a monastic has clearly refused an invitation to eat the first time, continuing to encourage further eating may be regarded as disrespecting the other person’s wish. This violates a basic principle of the Buddha-Dharma: not coercing or infringing upon another’s free intention. However, context is also important: if the refusal is made out of deference to another or as a polite pretense, a second encouragement may be acceptable.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.