Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Tibetan

Xct Mu Bi Pj 2Theft

Pāli / Sanskrit:Adinnādāna

📖332 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Sutra on Taking What Is Not Given (Adinnādāna)

Background

This sutra passage lies in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically the regulations on ethics and discipline in the Sangha. Adinnādāna, or taking what is not given, is one of the most serious violations in Buddhism. The sutra was recorded in the context of the Buddha establishing the ethical foundation for the Sangha in order to maintain purity and the trust of the people.

In Indian society at the Buddha's time, taking what was not given was considered among the most shameful actions. The Buddha, with unsurpassed wisdom, especially emphasized this offense because it violates the basic principle of ethics and directly harms the lives of others. Through detailed rules, he guided bhikkhus and bhikkhunīs to recognize clearly the boundary between taking and giving, between rightful ownership and unlawful appropriation.

Main Content

Taking what is not given (Adinnādāna) is defined as appropriating the property of others without consent. According to the Vinaya Piṭaka, this conduct includes specific cases such as taking money, jewelry, the belongings of a bhikkhu, or other valuable items without the owner's permission. Even taking small things, if not permitted, is considered a violation of the principle.

The Vinaya distinguishes clearly between levels of violation according to the value of the object taken, the intention of the person acting, and the degree of awareness of the wrongful nature of the act. A bhikkhu who takes an object worth the value of an Indian coin or more without permission has violated the Patimokkha, the basic precepts. If the object belongs to the Sangha or a monastery, the offense is considered more serious.

The rule also clarifies that "taking" must be understood broadly: it is not only material appropriation but also includes indirect actions such as enticing others to give an object or directing another person to take it on one's behalf. The reason for this is to protect the purity of the Sangha and maintain the people's trust in bhikkhus.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.