Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit

San Sarv Bu Pm Tf 11 Pj 3Murder

Pāli / Sanskrit:Manussaviggaha

📖319 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

The Manussaviggaha Discourse: The Rule Forbidding the Killing of a Human Being

Context

The Manussaviggaha discourse, concerning a human body, is found in the Sutta Vibhaṅga of the Vinaya Piṭaka, in the Pārājika rules, the gravest regulations that cause a bhikkhu who commits them to be expelled from the Sangha. This is the detailed explanation of the third Pārājika, concerning the killing of a human being.

The background arose from specific events during the Buddha’s time. In the early days after the Sangha was established, many bhikkhus had not yet fully abandoned former habits, or were drawn into difficult circumstances. This discourse records specific cases from which the Buddha established prohibitions to protect the integrity of the Dharma as well as human life.

Main Content

The third Pārājika rule declares: any bhikkhu who intentionally kills a human being (manussaviggaha, a human body), or seeks a way for that person to die, or praises death, or encourages another to commit suicide, commits a Pārājika offense, equivalent to losing the status of a bhikkhu.

The explanatory section (Vibhaṅga) clarifies the aspects of this rule. "Human being" (manussā) is defined as a human person capable of proper thought, not other beings. "The intention to kill" (chanda) is the decisive factor; without this intention, unintentionally causing death falls under lighter violations. The discourse clearly states many ways of causing killing: directly using a weapon, indirectly through poison, taking life by supernatural means, or leading another person to suicide.

The distinctions among cases are also set forth in detail: there are differences between killing one already born, one about to be born, or other complex situations. The Pāli discourse also records exceptions, such as when a bhikkhu defends himself appropriately and unintentionally causes death; that will be considered differently.

Practical Meaning

This rule is foundational for the First Precept, respect for life, which is the foundation of all Buddhist ethics.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.