San Sarv Bu Pm Finot Pc 40Asking for Fine Foods
Pāli / Sanskrit:Paṇītabhojana
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Source Status
This is a regenerated AI interpretation, not a translation of an original scripture. The present basis consists of the descriptive information: the Vietnamese title “Xin Thức Ăn Cao Lương,” the English title “Asking for Fine Foods,” the Pāli title “Paṇītabhojana,” the designation “San Sarv Bu Pm Finot Pc 40,” the tradition “Sectarian Scriptures · Comparative,” the collection “Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit,” and the truncated ending portion of the Vietnamese text. The full source text at the stated path has not been collated, so the occasion of promulgation, list of foods, exceptions, original wording, or details of sanction cannot be confirmed. What follows interprets only what can be identified from the title and ending passage.
Context
In the renunciant life, eating has a very special place. Food is necessary to sustain the body, but it is also one of the powerful gateways of sensual desire. Practitioners live by offerings from laypeople and therefore need even greater care: receiving food in order to nourish the body for the path, not turning receiving into demanding, selecting, or directing others according to one’s personal taste. Thus, Vinaya often treats the way of asking, receiving, and using food as an important part of the holy life.
The title “Paṇītabhojana” may be understood generally as fine, excellent, refined, or luxurious food. The English title “Asking for Fine Foods” shows that the focus is not only eating delicious food, but the act of asking, requesting, or hinting in order to obtain fine food. The designation “Pc 40” suggests a training rule concerning conduct to be restrained, but the exact category of offense should not be asserted without comparing the full text. The truncated ending emphasized the difference between receiving calmly and actively making demands.
Content Identifiable from the Descriptive Information
From the descriptive information, it can be determined that the content concerns a practitioner not actively asking for fine or special foods out of personal preference. The ending passage speaks of “good, wholesome foods or specialties,” “elaborately cooked dishes,” and foods prepared by request. Since the full text is unavailable, these phrases should not be taken as a complete technical list; however, they show the direction of the interpretation: the training rule aims at the mind that delights in taste and the tendency to use the relationship of offering to satisfy desire.
Another identifiable point is the distinction between receiving and asking. If a layperson voluntarily offers fine food, a practitioner may receive it mindfully according to the limits established by the Vinaya. But if the practitioner hints, requests, or creates pressure for the layperson to prepare a special dish, that conduct distorts the meaning of alms. Alms-round means receiving what is lawful and suitable, given with wholesome intention; it is not ordering according to taste.
The ending passage also says that violation depends on degree and specific action, but because the source has not been collated, those degrees cannot be described precisely. What is more certain is that the theme relates to restraint in eating, protecting the faith of laypeople, and keeping the renunciant life from being governed by the desire for enjoyment. The Vinaya does not deny the need to nourish the body, but it places limits on the seeking of pleasant taste.
Meaning for Practice
The prominent meaning for practice is to observe craving through the sense of taste. Craving does not always appear in crude form; sometimes it comes very lightly, as a thought: “It would be nice to have this dish,” “that person should know I like this,” “ordinary food is not good enough.” If not recognized, such small thoughts can become suggestions, become a habit of being served, and then become dependence on comfort. This training rule helps the practitioner return to the basic purpose of eating: nourishing the body in order to practice the path.
For laypeople, this rule also protects the meaning of generosity. Offering is not the fulfillment of personal demands, but an act arising freely from faith and reverence. When the recipient does not demand, the donor’s heart is light. When the recipient is content, the donor clearly sees the purity of the Sangha. Conversely, if practitioners regularly ask for fine foods, faith can be harmed, because laypeople feel that their offering has been pulled toward serving desire.
For Buddhist learners today, “fine foods” may be understood more broadly. It is everything we want to have prioritized, prepared specially, or served according to our wishes: food, comforts, praise, favorable conditions. Practice does not mean rejecting every need, but seeing clearly when a need becomes a demand. Knowing how to receive ordinary things with an even mind is a great capacity. When the mind demands less, life becomes simpler, gratitude becomes clearer, and inner freedom has the opportunity to grow.
Comparative Note
The full source has not been collated, so this interpretation does not confirm the list of foods, exceptions for illness or special circumstances, conditions of offense, or formula of confession. No translator name, canonical location, division, chapter, or reference source is added beyond the descriptive information. When the complete text is available, the precise meaning of “Paṇītabhojana,” the scope of the act of “asking,” the difference between voluntary receiving and requesting, and any permitted cases if the text states them should be checked.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.