Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit

San Sarv Bu Pm Finot Np 21An Extra Almsbowl

Pāli / Sanskrit:Patta

📖319 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Patta Discourse (The Extra Bowl)

Background

The Patta discourse is part of the Vinaya Piṭaka, within the Theravāda tradition of the Buddha Dharma. The Vinaya Piṭaka records rules of ethical discipline for monks and nuns, established by the Buddha to protect harmony in the community of practice and to educate his disciples.

The background of this discourse comes from a specific situation in the monastic community. A monk or group of monks had a need to use an additional almsbowl (patta). The bowl is one of the essential requisites of monastics according to the monastic law, a symbol of humility and dependence on the generosity of laypeople. Yet the question of how many bowls a monk may possess is not a minor matter. It concerns the principle of property and accumulation among renunciants.

The Buddha built a detailed system of Vinaya to regulate the possession of property and avoid greed and attachment to material things. The Patta discourse reflects specific guidance on how to handle this situation, helping monastics understand the boundary between essential need and attachment.

Main Content

This discourse discusses regulations concerning the possession of an extra bowl in addition to the main bowl. According to the Vinaya Piṭaka, each monk is permitted to possess one main bowl (patta-mukhappatta) for daily use in alms practice and daily life.

However, if there is a legitimate need, such as when the main bowl is damaged, or in special cases, a monk may be permitted to possess an additional secondary bowl. The important point is that possession of a secondary bowl must be done carefully and in accordance with certain conditions of the Vinaya. It is not an arbitrary right, but an exception with a clear framework.

The discourse also gives instructions on how to proceed when the main bowl is restored or repaired, and on the specific periods during which a monk may possess both bowls.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.