Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit

San Sarv Bi Pm Tf 44 Ss 11Following a Schismatic

Pāli / Sanskrit:Bhedānuvattaka

📖297 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

THE DISCOURSE ON FOLLOWING ONE WHO CAUSES SCHISM (Bhedānuvattaka)

Background

The Discourse on Following One Who Causes Schism belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka and expresses the deep concern of Theravāda Buddhism for the integrity of the Sangha. In the historical context of early Buddhism, maintaining harmony in the renunciant community was considered an extremely important duty, because it directly affected the ability to propagate the Dharma and practice cultivation among bhikkhus.

Bhedānuvattaka (Bhedā = division, separation; Anuvattaka = following, complying) refers to disciplinary issues related to members of the Sangha who do not comply with the decision of the community or who show support for those who cause division in the community. This discourse lies within the scope of monastic rules, the Bhikkhupātimokkha, helping maintain the spirit of unity and discipline.

Main Content

Although the descriptive information does not provide the full text, according to the context of the Theravāda Vinaya Piṭaka, this discourse addresses situations in which a bhikkhu or bhikkhunī has actions or words that clearly show support for individuals or groups who intentionally cause division in the Sangha body. This may include:

Openly supporting people who proclaim different positions on doctrine or discipline; participating in separate meetings in opposition to the decision of the Sangha; or maintaining intimate contact with people who have been separated because of violating conduct. These actions are considered violations of the spirit of harmony and may lead to penalties such as Pabbājaniya, banishment, or even Ukkhepaniya, temporary suspension.

The purpose of the discourse is to clarify the boundary between freedom to express an opinion and associations that may harm unity. The Buddhadharma does not forbid discussion or constructive criticism, but it emphasizes that activities intended to cause division are inappropriate to the renunciant way of life.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản tóm lược AI · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.