Mpt Pc 69Groundless Accusation
Pāli / Sanskrit:Amūlaka
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
The Discourse on Groundless Accusation (Amūlaka)
Background
The Amūlaka discourse is found in the Vinaya, specifically in the Pātimokkha of the Theravāda tradition. It is one of the rules concerning defective conduct and the discipline of the Sangha. This text reflects complex situations in which bhikkhus or bhikkhunīs are accused of violating the discipline.
Amūlaka (amūla = without root, baseless + ka = a suffix of designation) describes the case in which a renunciant is accused without any evidential basis. This is a serious ethical issue in the monastic community, because a groundless accusation not only harms the honor of the accused person, but also undermines trust and harmony in the Sangha.
Main Content
According to the Pātimokkha rule, if a bhikkhu is accused of violating one of the rules, there must be reliable evidence. An accusation is considered "groundless" when the accuser cannot present any evidence, whether witness, material evidence, or the person's own confession. In such cases, the accusation is considered wrongful conduct.
The Vinaya states that if someone repeatedly makes groundless accusations without correcting their attitude, they will be disciplined at various levels: from being required to withdraw their words to facing heavier penalties if the violation becomes excessively serious. This shows that speech, especially accusatory speech, is not a small matter; it has real and deep ethical consequences.
The basic principle here is that four conditions must be fulfilled for an accusation to be valid: (1) It must concern an actual disciplinary rule; (2) It must be based on concrete evidence; (3) The accuser must have a proper mental attitude; (4) The accusation process must follow the regulations of the Sangha. When any of these factors is missing, the accusation becomes groundless.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.