Mpt Pc 51Sending a Monastic Back from Almsround
Pāli / Sanskrit:Uyyojana
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Exposition of the Uyyojana Discourse (Mpt Pc 51)
Background
The Uyyojana discourse is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically in the Bhikkhunī Pātimokkha, the rules for women monastics. This is part of the detailed discipline through which the Buddha and the Sangha established rules for the life of religious practice. This discourse concerns the daily work of women monastics when going on almsround, an essential activity in the life of the Sangha according to the Theravāda tradition.
The context in which this discourse arose is connected with specific situations that occurred among communities of women monastics in Sāvatthī and elsewhere. When going on almsround, women monastics needed to follow rules in order to maintain discipline and avoid actions that might cause suspicion or adversely affect the honor of the Sangha. Buddhist discipline is not merely a set of mechanical prohibitions, but guidance intended to protect the spiritual life and reputation of practitioners.
Main Content
Provision Pc 51 concerns the situation in which a woman monastic is sent back from almsround (uyyojana), that is, when someone does not allow her to continue or asks her to return from the almsround. In this context, if a woman monastic returns without a valid reason or from impure motives, this may constitute a violation.
The discipline states that women monastics should not allow themselves to be "sent back" arbitrarily or because of impure motives. If there is a valid situation, such as illness, a request from devotees, or work connected with the monastic community, returning is appropriate. However, allowing another person to "send" one back for invalid reasons or in order to avoid responsibility in practice violates the spirit of the Vinaya.
This reflects a profound principle in the Buddhist Vinaya: each monastic must take responsibility for their own actions. One cannot blame others or rely on others in order to escape the rules of training. A practitioner must have self-awareness and self-mastery in observing the precepts.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.