San Mu Bu Pm GBM 3 Sk 31Nānujñātā niṣatsyāma
Pāli / Sanskrit:Nānujñātā niṣatsyāma
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
The Nānujñātā Niṣatsyāma Discourse: Not Permitted to Refuse
Background
This discourse belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka in the Theravāda tradition of the Buddha-Dharma. The Vinaya Piṭaka is the collection of regulations concerning the discipline of the Sangha, gradually developed in the early years after the Buddha’s awakening. Each rule (Pātimokkha) was established in response to specific situations that occurred in the community of monks and nuns.
The title of this discourse, Nānujñātā niṣatsyāma, “not permitted to refuse,” reflects a basic principle of Sangha discipline: the lawful authority of the monastic community in carrying out humane regulations. It is not despotism, but collective management intended to protect the spirit of practice and the harmony of the Sangha.
The historical background of this rule is often connected with cases in which monastics refused to comply with proper decisions of the Sangha, or stubbornly refused to correct wrongful behavior even after warning. The Buddha established that when the whole Sangha decides that a matter is necessary, a monastic cannot unilaterally refuse without a valid reason.
Main Content
The discourse stipulates that when the Sangha has decided a matter related to discipline or communal action, a monk (bhikkhu) or nun (bhikkhunī) cannot say “I do not accept it” (nānujñātā) and have that remain valid. Baseless refusal is considered a serious breach of discipline.
This emphasizes two important principles: first, a decision of the Sangha, when made according to formal rules, through contact, hearing, recollection, and examination, is binding; second, the integrity of the community of practice depends on the voluntary practice of each individual within the collective framework.
However, Buddhist discipline is not absolute. If a monastic has valid reasons, such as a medical issue, misunderstanding of a regulation, or clear injustice, he or she may request reconsideration.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.