San Mg Bu Pm Ss 3Indecent Speech
Pāli / Sanskrit:Duṭṭhullavācā
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
Indecent Speech — Duṭṭhullavācā
---
Source Status
This entry belongs to the Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit, a collection of Buddhist legal texts compiled through comparative study among multiple sectarian traditions. At present, the full original Sanskrit source text of item San Mg Bu Pm Ss 3 has not been directly compared in the existing database; therefore this presentation is not a translation of the original scripture. The content below is a scholarly explanation based solely on the provided descriptive information, including: the sectarian tradition, the academic Pāli/Sanskrit name of the training rule Duṭṭhullavācā, and the English title Indecent Speech. Readers should note this distinction and consult the original text when access is available.
---
Background
The term Duṭṭhullavācā (which may be transcribed as Duṭṭhulla-vācā) is composed of two elements: duṭṭhulla, meaning coarse, base, impure, defiled; and vācā, meaning speech, language, words. Joined together, the term denotes speech that is coarse, suggestive, and impure, especially words with sexual content or disrespect toward celibate conduct.
In the Buddhist legal system, training rules are often divided according to the severity of the offense. The designation Bu Pm Ss in this item number suggests that this is a training rule for bhikkhus (Bu = Bhikkhu), belonging to the Saṅghādisesa group (Ss), that is, one of the serious kinds of offense requiring the witnessing and handling of the entire Sangha. The Saṅghādisesa group is usually ranked as the second most serious after irreparable offenses, requiring the offending bhikkhu to undergo a period of probation and organized confession before the witness of the Sangha.
The appearance of this item in the Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit shows that this is a training rule recorded and transmitted through at least one sectarian tradition using Sanskrit or Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit, possibly including traditions such as Mūlasarvāstivāda, Mahāsāṃghika, or other schools that preserved the Vinaya in Sanskrit form.
---
Content Identifiable from the Descriptive Information
Based on the term Duṭṭhullavācā and its position as the third Saṅghādisesa in the bhikkhu list, several general scholarly points may be identified as follows:
Regarding the object of the training rule: This rule is directed at the act of using coarse, sexually suggestive, or provocative speech toward women or others in ways inappropriate to the conduct of one who has gone forth. Impure speech may include sexual innuendo, flirtatious words, or language that stirs desire.
Regarding severity: Because it belongs to the Saṅghādisesa group, violation of this training rule does not lead to immediate expulsion from the Sangha (as in the Pārājika group), but its consequences remain very serious in terms of the purity of discipline and require the intervention of the Sangha community.
Regarding the comparative method among sectarian traditions: The appearance of this training rule in the Comparative Vinaya shows that many sectarian traditions recognized Duṭṭhullavācā as a significant offense, though the specific details, conditions constituting the offense, and method of penalty may differ among traditions.
---
Meaning for Study and Practice
The training rule on indecent speech reflects a fundamental principle in Buddhism: language is one of the principal gateways of karmic action, and impure speech not only harms the listener but also defiles the mind of the speaker.
For one gone forth, guarding speech is a practical expression of right speech in the Noble Eightfold Path. Coarse, sexually suggestive speech violates not only the written discipline, but also undermines the foundation of celibate conduct (brahmacariya), the purity in the life of practice that monastics are obliged to preserve. Celibate conduct here means not only refraining from sexual misconduct in body, but also keeping mind and speech undefiled by desire.
For laypeople, this training rule also has profound meaning: it reminds us that language has great power to create karma, and that pure speech is an essential practice no less important than action or thought. Cultivating awareness of words is a path toward inner purity and harmony in relationships.
---
Comparative Note
Because the full Sanskrit text of item San Mg Bu Pm Ss 3 has not yet been directly compared, all analysis in this explanation remains at the level of scholarly inference from the term’s name and the classificatory structure of the sectarian legal system. Researchers who wish to inquire more deeply should consult preserved Sanskrit Vinaya texts from the relevant sectarian traditions, as well as compare parallel legal traditions in the Pāli and Chinese canons, in order to gain a fuller understanding of this training rule, Duṭṭhullavācā.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.