Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Sanskrit

San Mg Bu Pm Pc 79Leaving Without Giving Consent

Pāli / Sanskrit:Chandaṁadatvāgamana

📖292 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

The Sutta on Leaving Without Permission

Background

The Chandaṁadatvāgamana Sutta (Leaving without giving consent) belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka in the Theravāda Buddhist tradition, specifically to the Pātimokkha, the fundamental prohibitions of the Sangha. This is a rule concerning the internal discipline of the monastic community, reflecting the aim of maintaining harmony and order in the collective life of those gone forth.

The historical background of this rule goes back to the lifetime of the Buddha. As the Sangha developed and had many members, matters of management, unity of intention, and collective responsibility became urgent. Each rule in the Vinaya Piṭaka has an origin story (aitihāsa) illustrating the reason for its establishment. This sutta especially emphasizes that a bhikkhu should not leave the community or an important meeting without permission or the consent of the community (Sangha).

Main Content

The rule of Chandaṁadatvāgamana states that a bhikkhu must not leave the Sangha or a gathering of monastics in circumstances that require collective presence without asking permission or without the consent of the community (chanda, the approval or shared intention of the group).

The term chanda here does not mean “desire” as a personal preference, but “formal consent,” a form of collective agreement expressed through procedures. When the Sangha has a resolution or necessary business, its members must respect the collective decision and must not depart on their own authority. Leaving without permission is a Pācittiya offense, one of the kinds of faults requiring probation (parivāsa) and public acknowledgement of the fault.

This does not apply unconditionally. If a bhikkhu has a legitimate reason, such as illness, an urgent matter connected with training, or a basic matter of practice, he may inform the elders or the leaders of the Sangha.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản tóm lược AI · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.