San Lo Bi Vb Ss 3Making an Accusation Out of Anger on an Irrelevant Pretext
Pāli / Sanskrit:Aññabhāgiya
Save your scripture progress
Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.
The Aññabhāgiya Sutta: Accusation Out of Anger on an Irrelevant Pretext
Background
The Aññabhāgiya Sutta belongs to San Lo Bi Vb Ss, the Saṅghādisesa section of the Vinaya Piṭaka, where the rules of practice for the Buddhist community of monks and nuns are recorded. The suttas in this section concern serious offenses within the monastic community, requiring public acknowledgement and orderly renewed practice (saṅghādisesa).
The context of this sutta reflects a situation in the community of monks and nuns where members may be accused of faults not because of their actual conduct, but because the accuser is governed by anger (dosa), resentment, or wrath. This is a serious matter affecting the harmony of the Sangha and the trust of the Buddhist community.
The Theravāda tradition places great importance on maintaining discipline and the purity of the community of monks and nuns. Therefore, faults such as false accusation based on motives of anger must be handled publicly and clearly according to the rules of the Vinaya.
Main Content
The Aññabhāgiya Sutta explains the situation in which a member of the Sangha is accused of an offense that in fact was not caused by that person’s action, but because the accuser acts under the influence of anger and wrath. The term “aññabhāgiya” means “irrelevant” or “belonging to another category,” that is, an accusation without a factual basis.
The core principle here is this: if a monastic is accused of a fault by another person, but the accusation is not based on actual conduct (na kira tena attano āgataṁ), and is only the result of an angry mind (kodha), then this is a distinct form of fault on the part of the accuser.
The sutta lays down that if the accuser deliberately uses an improper pretext to attack the character or honor of another because of personal anger, that action is considered a Vinaya offense worthy of being dealt with. False accusation not only harms the accused person, but also destroys trust and harmony within the Sangha.
🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.
Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.