Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Sarv Bu Vb Pc 1Lying

Pāli / Sanskrit:Musāvāda

📖318 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

Explanation of the Musāvāda Sutta (Lying)

Background

The Musāvāda Sutta belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka in the Theravāda tradition of the Buddha-Dharma, specifically the Pācittiya section, the rules concerning offenses requiring confession. This text is presented in the context of the Buddha’s establishment of the Vinaya Piṭaka in order to maintain the purity of the Sangha.

Lying (musāvāda) is regarded as one of the more serious ethical violations in Theravāda Buddhism. This is not because of any criminal legal character, but because it breaks trust, the foundation of the community of practice. The Musāvāda Sutta focuses on the classification, conditions, and consequences of lying, especially in the context of the Sangha and the life of training.

The Vinaya Piṭaka is not merely a formal code; it is an expression of inner practice. Every rule has its origin in a specific situation, in which a bhikkhu committed an offense and the Buddha then established a rule. Therefore, the Musāvāda Sutta does not merely forbid lying; it also points out its nature and its deeper harm.

Main Content

According to the Pāli tradition, lying (musāvāda) is defined as a person intentionally causing another to misunderstand the truth by speech, signs, or gestures. The subtle point here is intention (sañcetanā). The speaker must have the wish to mislead; if one happens to speak incorrectly without intention, it does not constitute the offense of lying according to the Vinaya.

The text distinguishes degrees of lying. Simple lying (musāvāda pācittiya) is an offense requiring confession, but if the lie concerns other serious matters, such as lying about supernormal attainments (jhāna), spiritual states, or lying to avoid punishment, the degree of fault may be heavier.

The communal context of the Sangha makes this issue urgent. If a bhikkhu lies, he not only harms his own honor, but also diminishes the confidence of laypeople, of the Sangha, and even of the Buddha-Dharma.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.