Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Sarv Bu Pm 2 Pc 52Obstructing a Legal Procedure

Pāli / Sanskrit:Kammapaṭibāhana

📖313 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

SUTTA ON OBSTRUCTING THE PROCEDURE FOR RESOLVING DISPUTES

(Kammapaṭibāhana Pātimokkha Sikkhāpada)

Background

The Sutta on Obstructing the Procedure for Resolving Disputes (Kammapaṭibāhana) is found in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Theravāda Buddhist tradition, specifically in the Pātimokkha, the basic code that bhikkhus and bhikkhunīs must observe. This code was built from actual disputes that arose in the Sangha during the Buddha’s lifetime.

Kammapaṭibāhana is one of the Pācittiya rules, rules requiring confession, established by the Blessed Buddha when he saw that monks and nuns deliberately obstructed official procedures of the Sangha in order to protect members who had violated the discipline. This action undermines unity and trust in the community of practice.

Main Content

According to the Pāli Vinaya, when the Sangha becomes aware that a monk or nun has violated the discipline, the official procedure of kamma, an act or formal action of the Sangha, is carried out in order to examine and handle the violation. This procedure includes the steps of first making an announcement (ñatti), followed by repeated proclamations (anusāvana) to confirm the offense.

Obstruction (paṭibāhana) is defined as when a monk or nun intentionally interferes with, interrupts, or prevents this procedure by lying, fabricating, or declaring falsehoods in order to cover for the offender or to make the procedure unable to proceed. This differs from simply expressing a different opinion; it is a deliberate act of undermining the openness and fairness of the procedure.

The rule states that any monk or nun who obstructs the procedure for resolving disputes must confess the fault. This is a pācittiya, an offense more serious than the lightest faults but not to the extent of expulsion from the Sangha. Confession before another monastic is the means of correction.

Practical Meaning

The Kammapaṭibāhana rule expresses a profound principle of early Buddhism: the Sangha must function with transparency and fairness.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản tóm lược AI · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.