Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Sarv Bi Vb Ss 17Siding With One Socializing

Pāli / Sanskrit:Saṁsaṭṭhānuvattaka

📖301 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

SAṀSAṬṬHĀNUVATTAKA SUTTA

On Distinguishing Those Who Take Sides

Background

The Saṁsaṭṭhānuvattaka Sutta belongs to the Vinaya Piṭaka, specifically the Sutta Vibhaṅga, and is a key component of the monastic rules of Theravāda Buddhism. The background of this text is connected with the need to maintain discipline (Vinaya) in the Sangha from the time of the Buddha.

In the early period of the Sangha, as the bhikkhus grew numerous, disputes and conflicts between different groups of monastics gradually appeared. This text deals with a subtle but important problem: monastics who tend to “take sides,” or in other words, to adopt a position or support one side in internal disputes, thereby dividing the harmony of the Sangha body.

“Siding with one” is not merely a matter of speech, but an underlying psychological attitude, unconditional attachment to one person or group, often driven by one’s own mentality rather than by comprehensive understanding.

Main Content

The Saṁsaṭṭhānuvattaka Sutta discusses the act of “socializing” or engaging in intimate association with one person while opposing another, especially in the context of legal or doctrinal disputes (Dhamma) within the Sangha. A monastic violates this when he or she:

First, has a clearly biased attitude toward a member or group within the Sangha body without considering valid reasons; second, maintains close social relations only with one’s own faction and refuses normal communication with those outside the group; third, is ready to support one’s faction even when they are wrong, or criticize the other faction even when they are right.

The text prohibits what is called this “factional distinction” (saṁsaṭṭhānuvattaka), because it undermines the unity (samaggī) and harmony (samavāya) of the Sangha, two elements considered vital for maintaining the Dharma.

Practical Meaning

This text teaches that a true monastic must maintain psychological and intellectual independence.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: CC0-1.0 (Sujato) · personal-use (Minh Châu) · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.