Inti DharmaInti Dharma
← Scripture
Early Schools · Comparative Canon · Comparative Vinaya — Chinese

Lzh Sarv Bi Pm Dh Pc 104Not Asking Permission

Pāli / Sanskrit:Anāpucchā

📖271 words · ~1 min read
2

Save your scripture progress

Create a free account to save scriptures, track progress, and continue your daily learning path.

Create account →
Interpreted by Inti AI (English)
🪷 AI interpretation

THE ANĀPUCCHĀ DISCOURSE — ON NOT ASKING PERMISSION

Background

Anāpucchā is a prohibition in the Vinaya Piṭaka of the Early Buddhist tradition. This discourse is directly connected with the discipline of bhikkhus and bhikkhunīs, especially regulations concerning disrespectful actions and the discipline of the monastic community.

In the context of the early monastery, elders, venerable teachers, and senior bhikkhus were guides in practice and leaders of the Sangha community. When younger or less experienced bhikkhus performed important actions, such as using communal property, taking part in Sangha activities, or making decisions in matters of practice, without asking permission or reporting to senior practitioners, this was considered disrespectful, undisciplined, and harmful to the harmony of the Sangha community.

Main Content

The Anāpucchā Discourse concerns performing important actions without asking permission (anāpucchā) from elders or leaders of the Sangha. Specifically, if a bhikkhu does such things as using property of the Sangha, taking part in matters related to monastery management, or deciding matters of personal practice without the permission or knowledge of senior bhikkhus (mahallaka bhikkhu), this is regarded as a violation of disciplinary principles.

This action is not merely a personal matter; it affects common administration, trust, and order within the community. The Vinaya Piṭaka emphasizes that in a well-organized Sangha, respect must exist as a basic principle. Asking permission is not a sign of weakness, but an expression of respect and an acknowledgment of the structure and wisdom of the community.

Depending on the nature of the action and the violation, it may be regarded as a fault requiring correction (pācittiya), demanding confession and rectification of that action.

🌏Why is this sūtra summarized by Inti AI?

🌏 The Buddhist canon is vast — some sūtras (such as comparative Vinaya across schools, or untranslated Tibetan-canon texts) have to this day NEVER been translated into Vietnamese or English by anyone, scholars included. Rather than leave it blank, Inti AI offers a FAITHFUL summary grounded in the tradition — from the sūtra's title, origin and essence — so you can still reach this rare part of the treasury. Whenever an original translation exists, the app shows the original first.

Translation source: Interpreted by AILicense: VI: bản tóm lược AI · EN: AI translation from Vietnamese source, awaiting source English

Translations belong to the translator/source credited above. The bilingual compilation, presentation, and AI translations compiled by Inti are © Inti Foundation. Please attribute when quoting; do not bulk-copy or use commercially without permission.